| Revision as of 21:24, 22 July 2008 editGulmammad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,816 editsm +id← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:13, 25 July 2008 edit undoGulmammad (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,816 edits need helpNext edit → | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
| ==Deletion of Neftyanik '66 Navbox== | ==Deletion of Neftyanik '66 Navbox== | ||
| As a FYI, you may have an opinion on the proposed deletion of ], if so, please post to ].--] (]) 14:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC) | As a FYI, you may have an opinion on the proposed deletion of ], if so, please post to ].--] (]) 14:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| {{help|Can anyone tell me where to report when someone stalks me. Thank you. <b>] ]</b> 00:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)}} | |||
Revision as of 00:13, 25 July 2008
Skyline of Cornell over Ithaca NY.
Committed identity: B3725512A95EED67E285A20141E0A71A8B14EB39DBFF6C7C101A242DA6330981 is a SHA-256 commitment to this user's real-life identity.
 Archives |
|---|
|
|
If you wish to leave a new message, then edit this page and just make sure you didn't forget the subject/headline before you saved it. If a conversation is started here, I'll respond here; if it starts on your talk page, I'll respond there.
Vandalism and insults left here will be recycled in the bit bucket. Remember: be nice!
M. S. El Naschie, S. El Naschie or M. Naschie
The article which appeared under above names has been deleted see debate page.
nobel icons
hello, the nobel icons are explicitly forbidden per {{infobox scientist}}. cheers! --emerson7 12:33, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hello as well but I couldn't see anything in {{infobox scientist}} which forbids or allows the nobel icons. Gülməmməd 20:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
- yes i suppose that is somewhat of a vague reference...try this: parameter=name. --emerson7 00:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
What the heck are you talking about?
You said "for the removal of the tags see talk" in the edit summary. I added a tag and then I removed it myself. Are you angry that I removed my own tag? Do you want me to add it back in? You then added back in unsourced images because I removed my own tag? Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 03:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, you are right, I am not as quick as you are in tagging. Honestly, it took me a while to find out those tags in the articles as they contain a lot of mess references! If I were you, I wouldn't give myself that much trouble to tag them. I replied in the talk so you can see there. And if you'd like to get rid of some stress (as usual in the morning), then feel free to remove the images or you can put a lot of tags on them until I will want to get rid of some stress as well... :) Gülməmməd 04:04, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Aghbulag
Hi Gulmammad. I just wanted to inform you that the two reverts you made at Aghbulag today do not qualify as vandalism, and you are still subject to your revert parole in cases such as those. An example of vandalism is adding "as;lkdfjas" to an article, not adding POV. Please treat this as a content dispute next time, as that's what it really was. If you have any further questions please feel free to ask me. Khoikhoi 03:59, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Khoikhoi, thanks for informing me. It was difficult to identify what was it, to me it was between vandalism (as content was removed or completely modified 1, 2) and a content dispute but more close to vandalism. So the warning also wasn't strict. May you advice what to do in exactly that situation. Gülməmməd 04:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Deletion of Neftyanik '66 Navbox
As a FYI, you may have an opinion on the proposed deletion of 1966 Neftchi Baku template, if so, please post to Deletion of Neftchi Template.--Friejose (talk) 14:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- For help with this template, please post a comment on the template talk page with a
{{reply to}}one or more of the previous editors.