| Revision as of 04:53, 25 July 2008 editKhoikhoi (talk | contribs)71,605 edits →Tendentious editing: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:31, 25 July 2008 edit undoSehend1 (talk | contribs)53 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Some user worried why i monitor Azerbaijani-related articles and revert destructive changes specially two enemies of Azeris: Kurds whom without knowing anything about history of Azerbaijan and Atropatane tries to force people that everywhere is Kurdistan. There are lots of ancient maps of Atropatane or Azerbaijan. they should educate themselves. | |||
| ==Stop edit warring== | |||
| Another group is persians who thinks Azeris are their slave and forever should live with them. Human rights allow people to decide to choose his neighbors. Persians can not keep Azeris forever in the jail. | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:West Azarbaijan Province|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. ] is also being warned. This has nothing to do with the merits of the dispute, it has to do with cooperative editing. --] (]) 21:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| If some users or admins think that defending my ethnic is war, no problem call it 'war'. i always have historical reasons or reference. What about destructive and baiased kurds or persians. Do they provide any reason? | |||
| Dear ] | |||
| it seems to me that people call my defense as war they don't track carefully what was the original text? was there any reference for that or no? if specially kurds come and destroy text without providing a reason. then i will appear to revert it. | |||
| Thanks for your message. I didn't start editing war. ] started it by forcing Persian script to Azeris. even we accept persian script, He added a word that is not grammatically correct in Azeri with Persian script. to solve it i added west Azerbaijan translation in Azeri in both Latin and persian scripts. i don't know why he thinks we should follow his idea to use Fazeri (a fake language which uses completely Persian words with one azeri verb at the end). For instance in Azeri similar to English adjective comes first followed by a noun. But in Farsi noun comes first. ] wanted to force Perisan words for west( غربی )and Azerbaijan(آذربایجان) and suggests using غربی آذربایجان. hence, we don't use as the first word in Azeri. --] (]) 22:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| However, if they provide a good reference, i will not revert, even it is not good for my ethnic. | |||
| Sehend July 24th. | |||
| == now good? == | |||
| Rahat shodi? Hala adminha umadan name Azario pak kardan. lotfan ham inghadr farso kordo Azario ina dar nayar. Ma hame irani hastim. Xodam na Azariam na kor na Fars. Amma tu familemun ham Azari darim ham fars. no problem.--] (]) 18:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Your edit summaries == | |||
| Please refrain from edit summaries like "reverting destructive changes by arabized and ethnically baiased users". There are several reasons why they are bad. First of all, they are insults, which are inadmissible in wikipedia. You have to discuss ]. Second, edit summaries must be helpful for other people and describe '''what''' was edited, not '''why''' was edited. Please also use article talk pages to resolve disagreements and ask independent editors to help resolve acute disagreements. `']] 23:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == care please == | |||
| before getting into the edit war please be advised of .--] <sup><span style="font-family:Italic;color:black">]</span></sup> 02:40, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Tendentious editing == | |||
| Before you continue editing, I strongly advise you to please read ], ], and ]. From looking at your contributions to Misplaced Pages, it is apparent that most of them consist of edit warring, ]-pushing, and incivil remarks (). Misplaced Pages is not a ]. It is a place where people are meant to work cooperatively as opposed to reverting against one another. From a glance at your edits, I hardly see any attempts to discuss your reverts at all. I am warning you that this type of behavior can get you blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Please stop, and consider that your edits are contrary to building an encyclopedia, our main objective as Wikipedians. Thank you. <tt class="plainlinks">]]</tt> 04:53, 25 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:31, 25 July 2008
Some user worried why i monitor Azerbaijani-related articles and revert destructive changes specially two enemies of Azeris: Kurds whom without knowing anything about history of Azerbaijan and Atropatane tries to force people that everywhere is Kurdistan. There are lots of ancient maps of Atropatane or Azerbaijan. they should educate themselves. Another group is persians who thinks Azeris are their slave and forever should live with them. Human rights allow people to decide to choose his neighbors. Persians can not keep Azeris forever in the jail.
If some users or admins think that defending my ethnic is war, no problem call it 'war'. i always have historical reasons or reference. What about destructive and baiased kurds or persians. Do they provide any reason? it seems to me that people call my defense as war they don't track carefully what was the original text? was there any reference for that or no? if specially kurds come and destroy text without providing a reason. then i will appear to revert it. However, if they provide a good reference, i will not revert, even it is not good for my ethnic. Sehend July 24th.