| Revision as of 18:32, 25 July 2008 edit69.221.67.60 (talk) ← Replaced content with ''''WHAT A FAG''''← Previous edit |
Revision as of 18:32, 25 July 2008 edit undoKnowledgeum (talk | contribs)Rollbackers1,459 edits Undid revision 227872174 by 69.221.67.60 (talk)Next edit → |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{WikiProject Illinois |class=Stub |importance=Low}} |
|
'''WHAT A FAG''' |
|
|
|
{{ChicagoWikiProject|class=Stub}} |
|
|
{{WPBiography |class=Stub |priority= |auto=yes |politician-work-group=yes}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to add the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
"Mr. Quigley is a heterosexual, but he has a large number of gay constituents and is supportive of gay causes. Recently, he played hockey in the Gay Games hosted in Chicago." |
|
|
|
|
|
Is the following sentence really necessary? "Quigley did not receive the endorsements of any organized labor union in the 2006 election." It seems to me that if we apply the endorsement preferences of a special-interest groups (big labor, big business, Greenpeace, N.R.A., Planned Parenthood, etc.) to Quigley, then we should include it for all politicians or Board Commissioners as a matter of consistency. |
|
|
|
|
|
:I've removed that unsourced sentence per ]. The article is being hammered with anonymous vandalism today so I've given it semi-protection for a day. —] / 16:05, 24 July 2008 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
This guy is a total tool. Let people edit this page. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 16:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
:Agreed, 100% <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 17:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
"Mr. Quigley is a heterosexual, but he has a large number of gay constituents and is supportive of gay causes. Recently, he played hockey in the Gay Games hosted in Chicago."
Is the following sentence really necessary? "Quigley did not receive the endorsements of any organized labor union in the 2006 election." It seems to me that if we apply the endorsement preferences of a special-interest groups (big labor, big business, Greenpeace, N.R.A., Planned Parenthood, etc.) to Quigley, then we should include it for all politicians or Board Commissioners as a matter of consistency.
