| Revision as of 00:54, 26 July 2008 editOstap R (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled5,021 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:03, 26 July 2008 edit undoTymek (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users8,492 edits →Alleged Far right groups in PolandNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :I was the one who added "alleged". It used to be just "far right groups in Poland", but I'm not sure all of these groups are really far right and not just right wing. This article seems a bit ]ish. ] 00:50, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | :I was the one who added "alleged". It used to be just "far right groups in Poland", but I'm not sure all of these groups are really far right and not just right wing. This article seems a bit ]ish. ] 00:50, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| :Also, the Far-right individuals in Poland list has to have very solid and reliable referencing or else it could be a violation of WP:BLP. ] 00:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | :Also, the Far-right individuals in Poland list has to have very solid and reliable referencing or else it could be a violation of WP:BLP. ] 00:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::Yes, it has to be solid. Some editors here obviously have axes to grind and this is seen in the article. ] (]) 01:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:03, 26 July 2008
This article describes some people and organizations as far right, when there own articles only describe them as right wing. I think a distinction must be made between the two. Ostap 05:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Alleged Far right groups in Poland
This is laughable. An encyclopedia with alleged article? How about creating an article on alleged Jewish thieves? Unless it is changed, I will delete this section. Tymek (talk) 00:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- I was the one who added "alleged". It used to be just "far right groups in Poland", but I'm not sure all of these groups are really far right and not just right wing. This article seems a bit WP:ORish. Ostap 00:50, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Also, the Far-right individuals in Poland list has to have very solid and reliable referencing or else it could be a violation of WP:BLP. Ostap 00:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, it has to be solid. Some editors here obviously have axes to grind and this is seen in the article. Tymek (talk) 01:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)