| Revision as of 15:58, 31 July 2008 editXymmax (talk | contribs)Administrators12,138 edits welcome and comment | Revision as of 23:03, 4 August 2008 edit undoShell Kinney (talk | contribs)33,094 editsm Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on R. L. Hymers, Jr.. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| == Proposed merger == | == Proposed merger == | ||
| Hello there. I see that, after making substantial edits at ], you reverted yourself and instead created a new article. I have left messages on both article's talk pages proposing that the two be merged, as our policies discourage ]. Let me state that while it appears that you are positively disposed towards the subject of the article, you clearly have made a good-faith attempt to include legitimately controversial matters. Additionally, your article is more compliant with the wikipedia manual of style that the other one; accordingly, I have proposed using your article as the base for the merger. Your comments are welcome at the ] ] ] ] 15:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC) | Hello there. I see that, after making substantial edits at ], you reverted yourself and instead created a new article. I have left messages on both article's talk pages proposing that the two be merged, as our policies discourage ]. Let me state that while it appears that you are positively disposed towards the subject of the article, you clearly have made a good-faith attempt to include legitimately controversial matters. Additionally, your article is more compliant with the wikipedia manual of style that the other one; accordingly, I have proposed using your article as the base for the merger. Your comments are welcome at the ] ] ] ] 15:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| == August 2008 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:R. L. Hymers, Jr.|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <font face="Tempus Sans ITC" color="#2B0066">] <sup>]</sup></font> 23:03, 4 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:03, 4 August 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Xymmax So let it be done 15:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Proposed merger
Hello there. I see that, after making substantial edits at Robert L. Hymers, you reverted yourself and instead created a new article. I have left messages on both article's talk pages proposing that the two be merged, as our policies discourage multiple articles on the same person. Let me state that while it appears that you are positively disposed towards the subject of the article, you clearly have made a good-faith attempt to include legitimately controversial matters. Additionally, your article is more compliant with the wikipedia manual of style that the other one; accordingly, I have proposed using your article as the base for the merger. Your comments are welcome at the article's talk page. Xymmax So let it be done 15:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
August 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on R. L. Hymers, Jr.. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Shell 23:03, 4 August 2008 (UTC)