Misplaced Pages

User talk:Nandesuka: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:30, 5 August 2008 editNandesuka (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,890 edits Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Cogs← Previous edit Revision as of 19:30, 5 August 2008 edit undoBlackworm (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers4,646 edits Female genital cutting: Confused?Next edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
I'm curious as to why you chose to ] a full two minutes after my last comment? Am I to take this as a sign you are no longer willing to discuss the issue? ] (]) 19:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC) I'm curious as to why you chose to ] a full two minutes after my last comment? Am I to take this as a sign you are no longer willing to discuss the issue? ] (]) 19:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
: Huh? ] (]) 19:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC) : Huh? ] (]) 19:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
::Are you being flippant, or are you genuinely confused? If the former, please advise me so I can stop good-faith attempts to communicate with you. ] (]) 19:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:30, 5 August 2008

Archives: Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Cogs

Given the compelling arguments to at least redirect, could you please undelete the edit history and redirect? Plus, the nomination rationale was not policy based, but were arguments to avoid in deletion discussions: WP:JNN and WP:ITSCRUFT. Even others arguing to delete indicated that the material is covered elsewhere (i.e. valid redirect location) or in their subsquent comments said they agreed with a redirect. As the article was not a copy vio, hoax, or libelous, i.e. there is nothing dangerious in its edit history, we can undelete the edit history, but allow for a protected redirect as suggested even by those arguing to delete. Thanks! --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 19:12, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

The consensus on that page clearly was against a redirect, and "cogs" is far too generic a term to redirect to Toontown Online. Kind regards, Nandesuka (talk) 19:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Female genital cutting

I'm curious as to why you chose to archive this discussion a full two minutes after my last comment? Am I to take this as a sign you are no longer willing to discuss the issue? Blackworm (talk) 19:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Huh? Nandesuka (talk) 19:27, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Are you being flippant, or are you genuinely confused? If the former, please advise me so I can stop good-faith attempts to communicate with you. Blackworm (talk) 19:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)