User talk:86.152.229.184: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 02:09, 1 September 2008 edit86.152.229.184 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:25, 1 September 2008 edit undo86.152.229.184 (talk) →My Nomination for Adminship: new sectionNext edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:

	{{unblock\|1=I read ], yet I fail to see your point. I'm being victimised while at the same time you're marginalising an oft-misunderstood genius. I feel my block is grossly unfair and an affront to net neutrality.}}		{{unblock\|1=I read ], yet I fail to see your point. I'm being victimised while at the same time you're marginalising an oft-misunderstood genius. I feel my block is grossly unfair and an affront to net neutrality.}}

			== My Nomination for Adminship ==

			I need a sponsor. Who's up for it?

Revision as of 02:25, 1 September 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Differential diagnosis. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. – Jerry 01:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Differential diagnosis. If you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, you will be blocked from editing. – Jerry 01:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Misplaced Pages username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. jj137 (talk) 01:47, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.152.229.184 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

House is an important figure in the field of differential diagnosis. I was staging a form of dirty protest in order to draw attention to this oft-overlooked fact.

Decline reason:

And we're staging a reaction to dirty protest by requiring you to sit out your block. Unpenalized civil disobedience misses the point. --jpgordon 02:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

86.152.229.184 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In which case I now take my fight against blocking in general! Dirty protests all around! Free beer for the first 50 entrants! MORE HOUSE!

Decline reason:

Read WP:GAB please. — MBisanz 02:06, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

86.152.229.184 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I read WP:GAB, yet I fail to see your point. I'm being victimised while at the same time you're marginalising an oft-misunderstood genius. I feel my block is grossly unfair and an affront to net neutrality.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I read ], yet I fail to see your point. I'm being victimised while at the same time you're marginalising an oft-misunderstood genius. I feel my block is grossly unfair and an affront to net neutrality. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I read ], yet I fail to see your point. I'm being victimised while at the same time you're marginalising an oft-misunderstood genius. I feel my block is grossly unfair and an affront to net neutrality. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I read ], yet I fail to see your point. I'm being victimised while at the same time you're marginalising an oft-misunderstood genius. I feel my block is grossly unfair and an affront to net neutrality. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

My Nomination for Adminship

I need a sponsor. Who's up for it?

Category:

Requests for unblock