| Revision as of 16:36, 3 September 2008 editNatalya (talk | contribs)8,270 edits →September 2008: Unblock request reviewed← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:08, 3 September 2008 edit undoSaga City (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers72,418 edits note re behaviour in respect of this pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=Requesting an additional block for ], who refused to engage in positive dialogue on the ] when invited, and did not provide suitable reasons for duplicating information in the article.|decline=] does not appear to have violated ], and also attempted to discuss this with you at ], referencing the information he had already found at ] about the issue. -- ] 16:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed|1=Requesting an additional block for ], who refused to engage in positive dialogue on the ] when invited, and did not provide suitable reasons for duplicating information in the article.|decline=] does not appear to have violated ], and also attempted to discuss this with you at ], referencing the information he had already found at ] about the issue. -- ] 16:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)}} | ||
| == To all administrators == | |||
| Please note, and take into account, that this anonymous user has reverted warnings and requests to respect consenus '''from this page''' since at least August 4. See history for details. Thank you. ] (]) 17:08, 3 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:08, 3 September 2008
Thank you for experimenting with the page Mark Scott on Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. cholmes75 15:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the external links you added to the page Tenby do not comply with our guidelines for external links. Misplaced Pages is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Misplaced Pages uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Agathoclea 11:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Welcome
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (217.36.107.9) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! DougsTech (talk) 11:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
A Roads
Hi, I just wanted to know why you think the A roads you deleted are not notable. Please see the notability guidelines in Misplaced Pages:Notability. There are many published sources covering these A roads from mapping web sites like Google Maps and Multimap. In addition they are shown in all UK motoring atlases and local maps like the A-Z publications. These are all independent sources and are reliable. If you disagree, I am happy to seek the opinions on other editors on this. Rawclaw (talk) 18:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Actually, notability guidelines for roads aren't fully fleshed out yet. You might like to contribute to the discussion at: Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (Transportation), though so far, it looks like road types like A-roads are deemed inherently notable. Rawclaw (talk) 12:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Please stop effectively deleting articles by converting them to redirects. There is a long-standing consensus that all GB A-roads are notable. Saga City (talk) 12:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments on Talk:A4018 road. It's an interesting theory that if a subject does not call for a long article it indicates that it does not merit one at all, but I don't think that many editors would agree with you. If that's what you really think, then I suggest that you repropose the article for deletion, and also debate your views on notability at Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (Transportation), as suggested above. I hope that you will feel able to abide by the consensus. Mhockey (talk) 13:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
WP:TW
Use of talk-page tempates
User warning templates are designed for clear vandalism or breach of policy. Misuse of such templates if you dispute the addition or removal of some content with another editor may be considered disruptive. Disruptive editing prevents the improvement of the encyclopedia and may result in blocks from editing. Please instead assume good faith, and try and address the concerns of editors. Thanks, Ian¹³/t 22:29, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Reply from Ian13
Thank you for your message on my talk page. I have replied to your message and would be grateful if you'd continue the discussion on my talk page. Ian¹³/t 12:13, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Please stop reverting B roads
There is no specific consensus in these controversial cases to redirect these pages. Please may I ask you to cease doing so, and instead discuss changes on the talk page. If you continue to delete the page content without discussion, you could be blocked for disruptive editing. Ian¹³/t 12:17, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
September 2008
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
217.36.107.9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Requesting an additional block for User:Seth Whales, who refused to engage in positive dialogue on the talk page when invited, and did not provide suitable reasons for duplicating information in the article.
Decline reason:
User:Seth Whales does not appear to have violated WP:3RR, and also attempted to discuss this with you at Talk:A4232_road#Junction_names_etc., referencing the information he had already found at Talk:A4232_road#Junction_names about the issue. -- Natalya 16:36, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
To all administrators
Please note, and take into account, that this anonymous user has reverted warnings and requests to respect consenus from this page since at least August 4. See history for details. Thank you. Saga City (talk) 17:08, 3 September 2008 (UTC)