| Revision as of 18:11, 1 September 2008 edit218.111.31.145 (talk) →bias: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:20, 6 September 2008 edit undoCarTick (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers26,340 edits →Indo-Us Nuc deal artilce split: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| 86.153.130.184 is a pro pakistani vandalizing articles. another user claimed he is a sock of a user called Nangparbat. please see and . help please. he is inserting pakistani argument everywhere n remove indian ones. he write administered near kashmir (india) n removes for pakistan. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:06, 1 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | 86.153.130.184 is a pro pakistani vandalizing articles. another user claimed he is a sock of a user called Nangparbat. please see and . help please. he is inserting pakistani argument everywhere n remove indian ones. he write administered near kashmir (india) n removes for pakistan. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:06, 1 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| == Indo-Us Nuc deal artilce split == | |||
| Good idea. I had it earlier but somehow did not get much support at that time. <FONT FACE="Times New Roman" SIZE="+1" Color="#FF0000">]</FONT><sup><FONT FACE="Benguiat Bk BT" SIZE="+1" Color="blue">]</FONT></sup> 19:20, 6 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:20, 6 September 2008
Archives
- I will usually reply on your talk page.
- I might take some time to respond to your queries or concerns.
- Maintain civility while posting your comments here.
 | |
| Misplaced Pages ads | file info – show another – #135 |
bias
86.153.130.184 is a pro pakistani vandalizing articles. another user claimed he is a sock of a user called Nangparbat. please see and . help please. he is inserting pakistani argument everywhere n remove indian ones. he write administered near kashmir (india) n removes for pakistan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.111.31.145 (talk) 18:06, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Indo-Us Nuc deal artilce split
Good idea. I had proposed it earlier but somehow did not get much support at that time. Docku 19:20, 6 September 2008 (UTC)