Russian web brigades: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:51, 17 September 2008 edit91.149.190.179 (talk) I wonder Mr. Biophys why you always interpret everything to the detriment of Russia? You have personal score with Russia? Or you could provide source proving that your interpretation is correct?← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:52, 17 September 2008 edit undo91.149.190.179 (talk) →Tactics: This section is based on one only source and not encyclopedic oneNext edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:
	*Before the ], the brigade's anti-U.S. operations reached unseen scale. The original publication describes: "it sometimes seemed that the U.S. was not liberating the Iraqi people from Saddam Hussein, but at a minimum had actually launched an attack on Russia and was marching on the Kremlin." However, it fell silent suddenly after Putin announced that Russia was not opposed to the victory of the coalition forces in Iraq.<ref name="Polyanskaya"/>		*Before the ], the brigade's anti-U.S. operations reached unseen scale. The original publication describes: "it sometimes seemed that the U.S. was not liberating the Iraqi people from Saddam Hussein, but at a minimum had actually launched an attack on Russia and was marching on the Kremlin." However, it fell silent suddenly after Putin announced that Russia was not opposed to the victory of the coalition forces in Iraq.<ref name="Polyanskaya"/>


	===Tactics===
	*'''Frequent changes of pseudonyms'''.<ref name="Polyanskaya"/>
	*'''Attempts to increase credibility.''' Brigades often tell stories about themselves, their work, and even publicize phone numbers, something which other forum participants don't do.<ref name="Polyanskaya"/>
	*'''Round-the-clock presence''' on forums. At least one of the uniform members of the team can be found online at all times, always ready to repulse any “attack” by a ].<ref name="Polyanskaya"/>
	*'''Introduction of arbitrary tracts full of facts and events'''. They are often completely fraudulent, but force their opponents to do extensive research to refute them.
	*'''Intentional diversion of pointed discussions'''. For instance, the brigade may claim that ] never had any connection with Communism or that not a single person was killed in ] in 1968 by Soviet tanks.
	*'''Individual work on opponents.''' "As soon as an opposition-minded liberal arrives on a forum, expressing a position that makes them a clear "ideological enemy”, he is immediately cornered and subjected to “]” by the unified web-brigade. Without provocation, the opponent is piled on with abuse or vicious “arguments” of the sort that the average person cannot adequately react to. As a result, the liberal either answers sharply, causing a scandal and getting himself labeled a “boor” by the rest of the brigade, or else he starts to make arguments against the obvious absurdities, to which his opponents pay no attention, but simply ridicule him and put forth other similar arguments."<ref name="Polyanskaya"/>
	*'''Accusations that opponents are working for “enemies”'''. The opponents are accused of taking money from ], the ], the ], ], the ], or the ] rebels.
	*'''Making personally offensive comments'''. Tendency to accuse their opponents of being ] during arguments.
	*'''Remarkable ability to reveal personal information''' about their opponents and their quotes from old postings, sometimes more than a year old.
	*'''Teamwork'''. "They unwaveringly support each other in discussions, ask each other leading questions, put fine points on each other’s answers, and even pretend not to know each other. If an opponent starts to be hounded, this hounding invariably becomes a team effort, involving all of the three to twenty nicknames that invariably are present on any political forum 24 hours a day."<ref name="Polyanskaya"/>
	*The original publication described how mentioning the word "lustration", formerly a secret police term in the Soviet Union, led to a choir about "bloody repressions by democratic murderers" and "witch hunts". In some popular forums, discussions marked with this word are automatically deleted from the search system.
	*'''Appealing to the Administration'''. The members of teams often "write mass collective complaints about their opponents to the editors, site administrators, or the electronic “complaints book”, demanding that one or another posting or whole discussion thread they don’t like be removed, or calling for the banning of individuals they find problematic."<ref name="Polyanskaya"/>
	*'''Destruction of inconvenient forums'''. For example, on the site of the ], all critics of ] and the FSB "were suddenly and without any explanation banned from all discussions, despite their having broken none of the site’s rules of conduct. All the postings of this group of readers, going back a year and a half, were erased by the site administrator."<ref name="Polyanskaya"/>
	*'''Infecting opponents' computers with ] and ]s.'''<ref name="Polyanskaya"/>

	===Criticism of the original publication===		===Criticism of the original publication===

Revision as of 04:52, 17 September 2008

The Internet brigades or Web brigades (Template:Lang-ru simplified Chinese: 网特；; traditional Chinese: 網特) are governmental teams of on-line commentators that participate in political blogs and Internet forums to promote disinformation and prevent free discussions of undesirable subjects. Such teams are allegedly affiliated with Russian state propaganda department and security services and with Chinese internet police The state-sponsored "Internet brigades" could be confused with other organized teams of information fighters that may push private political agendas, be involved in astroturfing, or participate in election campaigns.

Internet brigades in Russia

First publication

This alleged phenomenon in RuNet was described in 2003 by journalist Anna Polyanskaya (a former assistant to assassinated Russian politician Galina Starovoitova), historian Andrey Krivov and political activist Ivan Lomako.

They described organized and fairly professional "brigades", composed of ideologically and methodologically identical personalities, who were working in practically every popular liberal and pro-democracy Internet forums and Internet newspapers of RuNet.

One of their observations was that prior to 1998–1999 about 70% of audience of Russian Internet were people of liberal views, composed of Russian middle class and people in emigration; but already in 2003 according to authors there were about 60-80% of "totalitarian" posts at Russian forums.

The activity of Internet teams which allegedly appeared in 1999 and were organized by FSB.

Behavior and views

According to Polyanskaya and her colleagues, the behavior of people from the Internet brigades has distinct features, some of which are the following:

Any change in Moscow's agenda leads to immediate changes in the brigade's opinions.
Boundless loyalty to Vladimir Putin and his circle.
Respect and admiration for the KGB and FSB.
Nostalgia for the Soviet Union and propaganda of the Communist ideology, and constant attempts to present in a positive light the entire history of Russia and the Soviet Union, minimizing the number of people who died in repressions.
Anti-liberal, anti-American, anti-Chechen, anti-Semitic and anti-western opinions. Xenophobia, racism, approval of skinheads and pogroms.
Accusation of Russophobia against everyone who disagrees with them.
Hatred of dissidents and human rights organizations and activists, political prisoners and journalists, especially Anna Politkovskaya, Sergei Kovalev, Elena Bonner, Grigory Pasko, Victor Shenderovich, and Valeria Novodvorskaya.
Emigrants are accused of being traitors of the motherland. Some members will claim that they live in some Western country and tell stories about how much better life is in Putin's Russia.
Before the Iraq War, the brigade's anti-U.S. operations reached unseen scale. The original publication describes: "it sometimes seemed that the U.S. was not liberating the Iraqi people from Saddam Hussein, but at a minimum had actually launched an attack on Russia and was marching on the Kremlin." However, it fell silent suddenly after Putin announced that Russia was not opposed to the victory of the coalition forces in Iraq.

Criticism of the original publication

A public discussion began in the Internet forum of the "Russian Journal", just a few days after the first publication by Polyanskaya and others, and it lasted for two months. Alexander Usupovski, head of the analytical department of the Federation Council of Russia (Russian Parliament) claimed Web brigades are conspiracy theory.. Yusupovskiy supposed, that officeers of GRU or FSB have more topical problems, than "comparing virtual penises" with liberals and emigrants. He concluded that "We would never make our country's military organizations and security services work under the rule of law and legal control, if won't learn to recognize rationally and objectively their necessity and usefulness for the country, state, society and citizens. Sweeping defamation and intentional discreditation with the help of "arguments", which are obviously false, only contribute to the extrusion of security services outside of rule of law and instigates them to chaos".

Support of the original publication

The findings of Polyanskaya and her colleagues have been supported by writer Grigory Svirsky and psychologist Vladimir Bagryansky. They claimed that "the Internet brigade led by Alexander Usupovski is probably the most incompetent team of Russian state security services in RuNet". Other bloggers also claimed that Usupovsky and his supporters are the governmental "Internet brigade", "FSB agents", and "bastards of SMERSH". A discussion was also conducted on the Internet forum of Moscow News . Usupovsky supporters suggested to sue Ivan Lomko for libels and defamation and issued various threats.

Public perception in Russia

In 2007 sociological analysis of big groups in Russian society published at Russian resource RIO-Center, it's mentioned that idea of existence of web-brigades is a widespread point of view in RuNet. Authors say "it's difficult to say whether hypothesis of existence of web-brigades corresponds to reality", but claim that users professing views and methods that are ascribed to members of "web-brigades" may be found in vast amounts at various opposition forums.

LiveJournal fighters

A member of National Bolshevik Party Roman Sadykhov reported about "LiveJournal fighters", directed and paid from the Kremlin and instructions given to them by Vladislav Surkov, a close aide of Vladimir Putin Surkov allegedly called Livejournal "a very important sector of work" and said that people's brains must be "nationalized" . He instructed "LiveJournal fighters" that

"We are losing in the Internet in that respect. It is always easier to break down things than to do something positive. What you are doing are jokes and minor infractions. Not only methods, but also goals must be radical. We must blow this romantics out of them . It is important not only to protect the authorities - this is understood, but we need to attract young people who can work creatively in the Internet. This is an important communication place of young people. Make them interested in conversations with you."

Russian state security teams

Russian intelligence expert Andrei Soldatov made the following points when asked by Yevgenia Albats about "internet brigades" :

Russian state security teams actively disrupt work of certain political blogs;
One of the teams, who called themselves GRU officers, was actively involved in a disinformation campaign prior to US invasion of Iraq;
The teams are also involved in hacker attacks, and they have probably attacked his own web site during the Moscow theater hostage crisis;
Some of the "internet brigades" are coordinated by the Russian signals intelligence, which is currently a part of the FSB and has been formerly a part of 16th KGB department;
There are also such teams from the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs.

Internet brigades in Russian literature

The alleged FSB activities on the Internet have been described in the short story "Anastasya" by Russian writer Grigory Svirsky, who was interested in the moral aspects of their work. He wrote: "It seems that offending, betraying, or even "murdering" people in the virtual space is easy. This is like killing an enemy in a video game: one does not see a disfigured body or the eyes of the person who is dying right in front of you. However, the human soul lives by its own basic laws that force it to pay the price for the virtual crime in his real life".

Kremlin's Agents of Influence

Paul Goble, director of research and publications at the Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy, claims "the Kremlin has dispatched its own “agents of influence” to political forums on the Internet both to portray itself as having more support than it has and to suggest that its opponents who would like to see a more democratic Russia with closer ties to the West are an ever more marginal group"

Russian brigades in the Polish Internet

Russian "Internet brigades" allegedly appeared in Poland in 2005, according to claims of anonymous "Polish experts on Russian affairs", reported by the Polish newspaper Tygodnik Powszechny. "at least a dozen active Russian agents work in Poland, also investigating the Polish Internet.

They are claimed to scrutinize Polish websites, and also to perform such actions, as—for instance—contributing to Internet forums on large portals (like Gazeta.pl, Onet.pl, WP.pl). Labeled as Polish Internet users, they incite anti-Semitic or anti-Ukrainian discussions or disavow articles published on the web."

Internet propaganda teams in mainland China

It has been reported that in 2005, departments of provincial and municipal governments in mainland China began creating teams of Internet commentators from propaganda and police departments and offering them classes in Marxism, propaganda techniques, and the Internet. They are reported to guide discussion on public bulletin boards away from politically sensitive topics by posting opinions anonymously or under false names. "They are actually hiring staff to curse online", said Liu Di, a Chinese student who was arrested for posting her comments in blogs.

References

^ China's secret Internet police target critics with web of propaganda, by Jonathan Watts in Beijing, June 14, 2005, Guardian Unlimited
^ Commissars of the Internet. The FSB at the Computer by Anna Polyanskaya, Andrei Krivov, and Ivan Lomko, Vestnik online, April 30, 2003 (English translation)
^ Template:Ru icon Eye for an eye by Grigory Svirsky and Vladimur Bagryansky, publication of the Russian Center for Extreme Journalism
Internet as a field of information war against Armenia, by Samvel Martirosyan, 18 October, 2006,
George Monbiot, "The Fake Persuaders. Corporations are inventing people to rubbish their opponents on the Internet," The Guardian (UK) (posted by Norfolk Genetic Information Network), May 14, 2002,
Jeffrey H. Birnbaum, "For Activist Constituents, Click Here," The Washington Post, September 19, 2005.
Articles by Anna Polyanskaya, MAOF publishing group
Template:Ru icon "They are killing Galina Starovoitova for the second time", by Anna Polyanskaya
^ Conspiracy theory, by Alexander Usupovsky, Russian Journal, 25 April, 2003
Big groups in Russian society: analysis of prospects of organization of collective actions., by RIO-Center. (in Russian)
Template:Ru icon Interview with Roman Sadykhov, grani.ru, 3 April, 2007
^ Military wing of Kremlin (Russian), The New Times, 19 March, 2007
State control over the internet, a talk show by Yevgenia Albats at the Echo of Moscow, January 22, 2006; interview with Andrei Soldatov and others
" Grigory Svirsky Anastasya. A story on-line (Full text in Russian)
Paul Goble Kremlin’s ‘Agents of Influence’ Said Tilting Internet Forums against the West
Operation "Disinformation" - The Russian Foreign Office vs "Tygodnik Powszechny", Tygodnik Powszechny, 13/2005

External links

The original publication:

Translation to English: Commissars of the Internet - The FSB at the Computer. By Anna Politkovskaya, Andrei Krivov, and Ivan Lomko.

Discussions of existence of web-brigades in RuNet:

Russophone LiveJournal community FSB Brigade for Smothering Democracy
Discussion of the article Red Web Brigades at Nnov.Ru (in Russian)
Discussion of control over internet and personal security with Yevgeniya Albats at Moscow-based radio channel Echo Moskvy. (in Russian)

Categories:

Misplaced Pages