| Revision as of 06:02, 1 October 2008 view sourceNsaa (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,851 edits Ahh sorry. Rv to 2008-10-01T02:50:36← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:10, 2 October 2008 view source 12.207.27.25 (talk) Undid revision 242179714 by Nsaa (talk)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Dear Xinunus, please use the ''''Show preview''''-functionality until you are satisfied with your edits. See ]: ''"Saving the same article a large number of times in quick succession makes it harder for people to check what changed, and clogs up the page history"''. Thank you and best regards, --] (]) 07:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| I tried that and was having a problem getting it to just display a thumb preview of the picture. I had to use a gallery to finally get it to work. --] (]) 04:00, 29 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Editorials are usually not neutral and thus should not be cited. And you must be well aware of it. ] (]) 19:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::My sources are not editorials. When a journalist writes an editorial they state this in their article. My sources clearly are not doing this. They are reporting on his trip and the facts behind the trip. Please refer to the wiki site about ]. Its clearing states this. Per wiki rules you can not just delete information without looking like your vandelising a wiki page. You clearly started deleting information first then started asking questions later. This is not the proper way to go about editing pages on wiki. All my sources are from valid news organizations and are not editorials. Please stop deleting my information. --] (]) 02:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Please take a look at Weatherman/Terrorism RfC == | |||
| This is a message sent to a number of editors who recently edited ] or its related talk page, and following ] requirements: Please take another look at ] and consider new information added near the top of the article and several new proposals at the bottom. If you haven't looked at the RfC in some time, you may find reason in the new information and new proposals to rethink the matter. Thanks! -- ] (]) 04:41, 22 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Removing sourced material == | |||
| In the article ] you're sourced material. I will not undo it after my last revert, ref. {{tl|uw-3rr}}. If you have a source discrediting this, you should add the material discussing the source, not remove obvious sourced statements/pictures. --] (]) 20:20, 25 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Make sure to obey ], ], ], ]. Feel free to contact an admin. -- ] (]) 20:23, 25 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::] - This is the same thing as WP:LIVE. There is nothing biased about this post. It states facts about a trip Obama made to Kenya. This is a "Neutral point of view". This does not apply. | |||
| ::] - This post is well sourced and provides three reliable sources. This does not apply. | |||
| ::] - This post has three verliable sources. This does not apply. | |||
| ::] - There is no advertising in this post. This does not apply. | |||
| ::--] (]) 21:23, 25 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| == Image:Odinga obama.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
| An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} ] (]) 17:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC) <!-- Template:Idw --> ] (]) 17:12, 27 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :Since there is a ], I've requested speedy deletion. | |||
| {| cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4" style="border: 2px solid #f00; background-color: #f1f1de;" | |||
| |- | |||
| | style="text-align: center" | '''Pay attention to copyright''' | |||
| | style="font-size: 90%" | ] has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read ]. For images, you may find ] useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in ]. | |||
| The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the ]. | |||
| ---- | |||
| {{copyvionote/lang}} | |||
| |}<!-- Template:Copyvionote --> | |||
| --] (]) 08:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :According to your statement on the Imagetalk: The assumption, that this image is public domain, is not enough, we need a clear proof of it. Who is the author and where did he say, that his image is public domain. --] (]) 01:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == September 2008 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{#if:Raila Odinga|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, '''you may be ] from editing'''. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. If necessary, pursue ]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 20:49, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| Note that this rule still applies even if you are logged out and editing as an IP. --] (]) 20:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :R.Schuster is the one who repeatedly removed this information from the beginning. Why are you not discussing this with him? Your being unfair and I will ask another admin to get involved.--] (]) 20:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well, since you've already made 4 reverts in less than 24 hours, are using your logged-out IP as a sockpuppet and are attacking multiple editors, I say go for it. By all means, get some administrators involved. --] (]) 21:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| ::Your claims are false and so are R.Schuster's. Both of you are deliberating teaming up to delete information that is well sourced. BOTH OF YOU DELETE FIRST AND ASK QUESTIONS LATER. THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO EDIT ON HERE. YOU AND R.Schuster are STARTING AN EDIT WAR NOT ME!!! You two are deliberating teaming up to delete information that is well sourced. I DID NOT POST INFORMATION ON ANOTHER IP ADDRESS EITHER SO STOP ACCUSING ME OF DOING SO. I AM SICK AND TIRED OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU COMING ALONG DELETING MATERIAL WITHOUT DISCUSSING IT FIRST. DO YOU EVEN KNOW R.Schuster IS MAKING UP LIES NOW ABOUT THE PICTURE AND TRYING TO GET IT DELETED WHILE MAKING FALSE CLAIMS THAT I CREATED THE PICTURE? THIS IS INSANE. THE PICTURE CAME FROM A WEBSITE THAT IS A VIABLE NEWS SITE. IT IS REAL AND HE IS CLAIMING IT ISNT! BOTH OF YOU NEED TO STOP VANDELIZING THIS INFORMATOIN AND PICTURE! --] (]) 21:31, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| ] '''Blocked:''' You have been blocked for 72 hours for ] on ]. Please be careful to discuss controversial changes rather than engaging others in a hostile manner. If you wish to contest this block, please place {{tlx|unblock|your reason here}} on this page. <small style="color:#999;white-space:nowrap">] // ] // ] // 23:10, 28 September 2008 (UTC)</small> | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=Why am I being blocked when 3 other users are vandilizing my post. I have had this post on this site for months and all of a sudden three users come along and start deleting my post without DISCUSSION. DID YOU BLOCK THE OTHER USER THAT KEPT REVERTING MY POST ALSO? I BET YOU DIDNT BECAUSE YOUR BIASED JUST LIKE HIM. YOU WANT THIS INFORMATION SURPRESSED FROM THE PUBLIC. You all are sad and pathetic.|decline=''I'm too sad and pathetic to even consider unblocking you.'' Perhaps if you want this request taken seriously, and don't want your block extended, you'll stop with the inappropriate comments. Cheers. — ] (]) 23:55, 28 September 2008 (UTC)}}--] (]) 23:52, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| PatrickFlaherty reverted my post 3 TIMES today. DID YOU BLOCK HIM? --] (]) 23:58, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :He is trying to prevent WELL SOURCED INFORMATION FROM BEING POSTED. He is vandelizing my post. Did you block him also?? --] (]) 23:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| :What I am mad at is the fact that people can so easily suppress information on here by just ACCUSING PEOPLE OF BAD SOURCES WHEN THEY AREN’T! It's sad and pathetic because I am sick and tired of this site being unfair to people that want to post TRUE FACTS. I have had three BIASED people today come along and VANDALIZE my post and YOU ADMINS DO NOTHING but BAN ME. This is sad and pathetic. You’re keeping people that want to post serious information on here from doing so. Posting on this site is TO MUCH WORK if you have to defend your post EVERY DAY. IT’S NOT WORTH IT!! I HAVE THREE VALID SOURCES ON MY POST AND YOU LET THE GUY REMOVE IT AND YOU BAN ME. I FEEL LIKE IM IN CHINA OR RUSSIA. THAT IS SAD AND PATHETIC!! IM DONE I AM NEVER USING[REDACTED] EVER AGAIN YOU ARE UNREASONABLE..--] (]) 00:03, 29 September 2008 (UTC) | |||
| {{indefblocked}} | |||
| Because of the pleasant email you sent me, I've now modified your block and removed the expiry. I've also disabled your ability to email. ] (]) 00:10, 29 September 2008 (UTC) | |||