| Revision as of 19:01, 25 September 2005 editGracefool (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,021 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:17, 29 September 2005 edit undo83.195.168.26 (talk) →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| **It was formerly redirected, but Franck ver Stut reinstated the page. Nothing links to it so there is no harm in it being wholly removed. ] 09:59, 22 September 2005 (UTC) | **It was formerly redirected, but Franck ver Stut reinstated the page. Nothing links to it so there is no harm in it being wholly removed. ] 09:59, 22 September 2005 (UTC) | ||
| *The more reasonable '''redirect'''s the better ] |] 19:01, 25 September 2005 (UTC) | *The more reasonable '''redirect'''s the better ] |] 19:01, 25 September 2005 (UTC) | ||
| '''Don't delete''' | |||
| The anti-Fomenko article is but a massive damage control machination staged by history undergraduates in search of credits. Most of the counterarguments advanced thereof are non-scientific hearsay albeit orderly structured. | |||
| Franck ver Stut | |||
Revision as of 17:17, 29 September 2005
New chronology fomenko
This page is mainly the personal opinion of the user Franck ver Stut on a topic already covered at New Chronology (Fomenko). The text is rambling, unencyclopedic and POV. The page was previously blanked and redirect to the main page on the New Chronology, but Franck ver Stut reestablished the page, calling the other one 'subversive'. As the page title is unlikely to be accidently linked to, it is better that this page is deleted Oswax 06:28, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. The topic is covered adequately at New Chronology (Fomenko). TheMadBaron 12:45, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to New Chronology (Fomenko). Not having to guess the parentheses can only be helpful, until MediaWiki gets a decent 'Go' button. -Splash 23:03, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
- It was formerly redirected, but Franck ver Stut reinstated the page. Nothing links to it so there is no harm in it being wholly removed. Oswax 09:59, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
- The more reasonable redirects the better ··gracefool |☺ 19:01, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
Don't delete The anti-Fomenko article is but a massive damage control machination staged by history undergraduates in search of credits. Most of the counterarguments advanced thereof are non-scientific hearsay albeit orderly structured. Franck ver Stut