| Revision as of 10:24, 14 October 2008 editXx236 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,481 edits →Notability← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:32, 14 October 2008 edit undoXx236 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,481 edits →League of Polish Families extreme right partyNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| :Do explain how you can justify keeping removal here and removing the very same claim by the same ref from /? --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 17:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC) | :Do explain how you can justify keeping removal here and removing the very same claim by the same ref from /? --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 17:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| ::If you have problems with different articles, list those grievances on proper talk pages. From now on, any future unrelated remarks presented here will be ignored by my. ] (]) 11:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC) | ::If you have problems with different articles, list those grievances on proper talk pages. From now on, any future unrelated remarks presented here will be ignored by my. ] (]) 11:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| *M.K. - this is an article about Dariusz Ratajczak. It isn't an article about LPR. You are vandalising this article. | |||
| *''extreme right'' isn't a serious description of a party. It's a denunciacion, after which 60 years ago many people in Lithuania died or were imprisoned in Gulag camps. Some people keep to denounce, even if comrade Stalin is dead.] (]) 10:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:32, 14 October 2008
 | Poland Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Notability
I'm not sure how notable a guy can be when most of his notability comes from a redlinked book. Even given the rest, if the book isn't notable enough to be here it's a strong indication it's author isn't either. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 14:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- The article was posted about an hour ago, so no article on book, yet. The guy have his PL article, his activities there covered by BBC News and his trial was described as the first serious case of Holocaust denial in the Poland. In my view he is notable enough, especially knowing that his works are used in wikipedia articles. Readers should know about his claims credibility, M.K. (talk) 14:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- That sounds good, then. I'll go remove the notability tag. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 14:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, then M.K. (talk) 14:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- That sounds good, then. I'll go remove the notability tag. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 14:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- The article was posted about an hour ago, so no article on book, yet. The guy have his PL article, his activities there covered by BBC News and his trial was described as the first serious case of Holocaust denial in the Poland. In my view he is notable enough, especially knowing that his works are used in wikipedia articles. Readers should know about his claims credibility, M.K. (talk) 14:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- He is notable: 1) publications 2) news coverage and 3) political involvement with LPR party.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 18:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
He obviously isn't notable outside Poland. This isn't a Polish Misplaced Pages. 1) publications of dubious quality, only in Polish. 2) Misplaced Pages isn't a newspaper. 3) being an alleged candidate during several days isn't involvement. There are millions such people around the world. Xx236 (talk) 10:21, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
weasel wording
"author appears to agree with Holocaust deniers who claim that for technical reasons it was not possible to kill millions of people in the Nazi gas chambers". To say something appears to agree with something is not NPOV. In whoose opinion. This needs attribution in addition to citation. Does the subject actualy say the samething as the deniers?--Doc 22:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- The source of such claim was present at the end of sentence. I also added additional attribution to the claim now. Hope this will solve the problem. M.K. (talk) 09:57, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- It does, thanks. Sometimes it is easy to forget that sourcing and attribution are not identical. Facts need sourced, judgements need attributed and sourced.--Doc 10:06, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- I see, thanks for heads up. Take care, M.K. (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
League of Polish Families extreme right party
League of Polish Families is/was extreme right party as noted in academic source: Racist Extremism in Central and Eastern Europe By Cas Mudde 2005 p.159 - The League of Polish Families (Liga Polskich Rodzin, LPR), which incorporates the All-Polish Youth (MW, see below) as its youth wing, is currently the main extreme right political party active on the parliamentary level. It was formed shortly before the September 2001 parliamentary election... Therefore I see no reason to remove this information, as was did . M.K. (talk) 13:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Do explain how you can justify keeping removal here and removing the very same claim by the same ref from here/here? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
- If you have problems with different articles, list those grievances on proper talk pages. From now on, any future unrelated remarks presented here will be ignored by my. M.K. (talk) 11:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- M.K. - this is an article about Dariusz Ratajczak. It isn't an article about LPR. You are vandalising this article.
- extreme right isn't a serious description of a party. It's a denunciacion, after which 60 years ago many people in Lithuania died or were imprisoned in Gulag camps. Some people keep to denounce, even if comrade Stalin is dead.Xx236 (talk) 10:32, 14 October 2008 (UTC)