| Revision as of 03:01, 17 October 2008 editOMCV (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,516 edits discussing your edits on the talk pages would be best← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:05, 17 October 2008 edit undoRFmedic (talk | contribs)19 edits Undid revision 245813631 by OMCV (talk) Tho shall cite acceptable sources per WP:CITE and WP:VERIFIABLENext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| | date=1996-12-01 | | date=1996-12-01 | ||
| | accessdate=2007-05-16 | | accessdate=2007-05-16 | ||
| }}</ref> | }}</ref>{{cn}} | ||
| ==The term "fuel cell"== | ==The term "fuel cell"== | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| == Lawsuit == | == Lawsuit == | ||
| {{Unreferenced|article's section called "Lawsuit"}} | |||
| In 1996, inventor Stanley Meyer was sued by two investors to whom he had sold dealerships, offering the right to do business in Water Fuel Cell technology. His car was due to be examined by the expert witness ], Professor of ] at ] and ] of the ]. However, Meyer made what Professor Laughton considered a "lame excuse" on the days of examination and did not allow the test to proceed.<ref name = "Times"/> According to Meyer the technology was patent pending and under investigation by the patent office, the ] and the military.<ref name="NEN4111"> New Energy News 1997</ref> His "water fuel cell" was later examined by three witnesses in court who found that there "was nothing revolutionary about the cell at all and that it was simply using conventional electrolysis". The court found Meyer guilty of "gross and egregious fraud" and ordered to repay the two investors their $25,000.<ref name = "Times"/> | In 1996, inventor Stanley Meyer was sued by two investors to whom he had sold dealerships, offering the right to do business in Water Fuel Cell technology. His car was due to be examined by the expert witness ], Professor of ] at ] and ] of the ]. However, Meyer made what Professor Laughton considered a "lame excuse" on the days of examination and did not allow the test to proceed.<ref name = "Times"/> According to Meyer the technology was patent pending and under investigation by the patent office, the ] and the military.<ref name="NEN4111"> New Energy News 1997</ref> His "water fuel cell" was later examined by three witnesses in court who found that there "was nothing revolutionary about the cell at all and that it was simply using conventional electrolysis". The court found Meyer guilty of "gross and egregious fraud" and ordered to repay the two investors their $25,000.<ref name = "Times"/> | ||
| Line 51: | Line 52: | ||
| == Meyer's death == | == Meyer's death == | ||
| {{see also|Free energy suppression}} | {{see also|Free energy suppression}} | ||
| Stanley Meyer died suddenly on ] ] after sipping from his drink while dining at a restaurant. An autopsy report by the ] ] concluded that Meyer had died of a ], but |
Stanley Meyer died suddenly on ] ] after sipping from his drink while dining at a restaurant. An autopsy report by the ] ] concluded that Meyer had died of a ], but some people insist that he was poisoned to ], and that oil companies and the United States government were involved in his death.<ref name = "Nature">{{cite web | ||
| | last= Ball | | last= Ball | ||
| | first=Philip | | first=Philip | ||
Revision as of 04:05, 17 October 2008
Template:Perpetual motion machine
For other water fueled devices, see Water-fueled car. For fuel cells in general, see Fuel cell.The water fuel cell is an invention by American Stanley Allen Meyer. He claimed that an automobile retrofitted with the device could use water as fuel instead of gasoline. The fuel cell purportedly split water into its component elements, hydrogen and oxygen, which were then burned to generate power, a process that reconstitutes the water molecules. According to Meyer, the device required less energy than conventional electrolysis and what physics says is possible. Also, if the device worked as specified, it would violate both the first and second laws of thermodynamics, allowing operation as a perpetual motion machine. Meyer's claims about his "Water Fuel Cell" and the car that it powered were found to be fraudulent by an Ohio court in 1996.
The term "fuel cell"
Throughout his patents and marketing material, Meyer uses the terms "fuel cell" or "water fuel cell" to refer to the portion of his device in which electricity is passed through water to produce hydrogen and oxygen. Meyer's use of the term in this sense is contrary to its usual meaning in science and engineering, in which such cells are conventionally called "electrolytic cells". Furthermore, the term fuel cell is usually reserved for cells which produce electricity from a chemical redox reaction, whereas Meyer's fuel cell consumed electricity, as shown in his patents and in the circuit pictured on the left.
One of Meyer's patents describes the use of a "water fuel cell assembly'" and portrays some images which allegedly demonstrate a "fuel cell water capacitor". According to the patent, in this case "...the term 'fuel cell' refers to a single unit of the invention comprising a water capacitor cell... that produces the fuel gas in accordance with the method of the invention."
Media coverage
In a news report on an Ohio TV station, Meyer claimed to demonstrate a dune buggy powered by his water fuel cell. He estimated that only 22 US gallons (83 liters) of water were required to travel from Los Angeles to New York. Meyer also claimed to have replaced the spark plugs with "injectors" to spray a fine mist of water into the engine cylinders, which he claimed were subjected to an electrical resonance. The water fuel cell would split the water mist into hydrogen and oxygen gas, which would then be combusted back into water vapor in a conventional internal combustion engine to produce net energy.
Philip Ball, writing in academic journal Nature, characterized Meyer's claims as pseudoscience, noting that "It's not easy to establish how Meyer's car was meant to work, except that it involved a fuel cell that was able to split water using less energy than was released by recombination of the elements … Crusaders against pseudoscience can rant and rave as much as they like, but in the end they might as well accept that the myth of water as a fuel is never going to go away."
While there have been many attempts to replicate the results of the system, nobody so far has claimed to have succeeded. Also, there is no documented proof that the system produces enough hydrogen to run an engine. To date no peer review studies of Meyer's claims or devices have been published in the scientific literature.
Lawsuit
 | This article's section called "Lawsuit" does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article's section called "Lawsuit" by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Water fuel cell" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
In 1996, inventor Stanley Meyer was sued by two investors to whom he had sold dealerships, offering the right to do business in Water Fuel Cell technology. His car was due to be examined by the expert witness Michael Laughton, Professor of Electrical Engineering at Queen Mary, University of London and Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering. However, Meyer made what Professor Laughton considered a "lame excuse" on the days of examination and did not allow the test to proceed. According to Meyer the technology was patent pending and under investigation by the patent office, the Department of Energy and the military. His "water fuel cell" was later examined by three witnesses in court who found that there "was nothing revolutionary about the cell at all and that it was simply using conventional electrolysis". The court found Meyer guilty of "gross and egregious fraud" and ordered to repay the two investors their $25,000.
Later designs
An ungranted Canadian patent application from 1998 describes a miniaturized "water fuel cell" which would be contained within the dimensions of a common spark plug. Included within the patent application are methods to perform "laser-priming" of the gases produced by the fuel cell, which are then mixed in the combustion chamber at the pre-ignition stage with ionized ambient air and non-combustible gases. This process Meyer claimed resulted in the production of free radical forms of hydrogen and oxygen and thus improved combustion.
It is not stated within the patent where the energy required for the ionization of the "ambient air" gases is originating.
Meyer's death
See also: Free energy suppressionStanley Meyer died suddenly on 21 March 1998 after sipping from his drink while dining at a restaurant. An autopsy report by the Franklin County, Ohio coroner concluded that Meyer had died of a cerebral aneurysm, but some people insist that he was poisoned to suppress the technology, and that oil companies and the United States government were involved in his death.
See also
References
- ^ Narciso, Dean (July 8, 2007). "The Car that Ran on Water". The Columbus Dispatch. Retrieved 2008-03-24.
{{cite news}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Ball, Philip (September 14, 2007). "Burning water and other myths". Nature News. Retrieved 2007-09-14.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|date=(help) - ^ Edwards, Tony (1996-12-01). "End of road for car that ran on Water". The Sunday Times. Times Newspapers Limited. p. Features 12. Retrieved 2007-05-16.
- ^ U.S. patent 5,149,407: Process and apparatus for the production of fuel gas and the enhanced release of thermal energy from such gas
- ^ U.S. patent 4,936,961: Method for the production of a fuel gas
- U.S. patent 4,826,581: Controlled process for the production of thermal energy from gases and apparatus useful therefore
- U.S. patent 4,798,661: Gas generator voltage control circuit
- U.S. patent 4,613,779: Electrical pulse generator
- U.S. patent 4,613,304: Gas electrical hydrogen generator
- U.S. patent 4,465,455: Start-up/shut-down for a hydrogen gas burner
- U.S. patent 4,421,474: Hydrogen gas burner
- U.S. patent 4,389,981: Hydrogen gas injector system for internal combustion engine
- http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7890314993072742238
- ^ Robinson, Ralph (Reporter), Tom Ryan (News caster) and Gayd Hogan (News caster) "Unknown Episode." Action 6 News. Unknown Network. Station call sign: WSYX. Filmed in Groveport. Length: 1 Minute 45 seconds. Republished by Annaheim, Kurt W. "Media Page - See, Hear and Discover Free Electricity." Last updated 7 May 2008. Befreetech.Com. Accessed 23 June 2008.
- "Stan Meyer's Files". Retrieved 2008-06-28.
- The "The Columbia Encyclopedia", Columbia University Press 2004 defines fuel cell as an "Electric cell in which the chemical energy from the oxidation of a gas fuel is converted directly to electrical energy in a continuous process"; and electrolysis as "Passage of an electric current through a conducting solution or molten salt that is decomposed in the process."
- Introduction: Batteries and Fuel Cells Whittingham, M. S.; Savinell, R. F.; Zawodzinski, T. Chem. Rev.; 2004; 104(10); 4243-4244.
- What Are Batteries, Fuel Cells, and Supercapacitors? Winter, M.; Brodd, R. J. Chem. Rev.; 2004; 104(10); 4245-4270.
- Chem. Rev.; 2004; 104(10), entire issue.
- Letter from Water fuel cell regarding stanley meyer's water fuel cell project New Energy News 1997
- ^ http://patents.ic.gc.ca/cipo/cpd/en/patent/2067735/summary.html?query=2067735&start=1&num=50
- "Water Powered Car report on Meyer's death". Retrieved 2008-03-24.
External links
- Stanley Meyer Website large resource of information www.waterfuelcell.org
- Stanley Meyer Bio from waterpoweredcar.com
- Fuel for fraud or vice versa? (On Stanley Meyer) — summary of the article in New Energy News.
- Meyer's rebuttal letter to New Energy News.
- Equinox: It Runs on Water 1995 film - Interview with Stanley Meyer