Misplaced Pages

talk:Requests for comment/Vanished user: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:29, 12 February 2008 editVanished user (talk | contribs)15,602 edits -sinebot← Previous edit Latest revision as of 03:58, 30 October 2008 edit undo86.131.250.7 (talk) Please do not continue to readd my name. 
Line 2: Line 2:
| This page has been ]. {{#ifeq:|yes|The ]'s decision is still in effect, and can be found in the .}} | This page has been ]. {{#ifeq:|yes|The ]'s decision is still in effect, and can be found in the .}}
|} |}

== Move ==

I have moved this page back. Our policy has been to blank the current page, and I believe we should follow the policy. Please note that RFC pages are not indexed by Google or other search engines. ] Co., ] 23:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

:If only that were the end of the story. Top result for "Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Adam Cuerden" is . Please delete this talk page? ] (]) 22:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

:: Better that we file a bug with the developers and fix the underlying problem. ] Co., ] 23:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

::: Do so. ] (]) 01:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

:::I don't care about your nonsense, frankly, and waiting for you to sort out bugs, and your insistance on poking me with a stick. I just want to leave. ] 03:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:58, 30 October 2008

This page has been blanked as a courtesy.