User talk:Daniel: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:34, 1 November 2008 editRjd0060 (talk \| contribs)33,499 edits →IRC: +comment← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:01, 2 November 2008 edit undoAbtract (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,199 edits →IRC: I am speechlessNext edit →
Line 40:		Line 40:

	Just a courtesy note – you are being discussed at ]. - ] (]) 23:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)		Just a courtesy note – you are being discussed at ]. - ] (]) 23:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

			I've just had a look at this and frankly I am disgusted. You have the temerity to officiate at
			] and remove some of my statement with a pompous reason that it was against the rules - which prompted me to take no part and then I discover you are considerably worse than even my biggest enemies would say I was ... I presume now that your true character has been outed you will ask for my case to be reconsidered? ] (]) 00:01, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:01, 2 November 2008

User:Daniel/Top

width="270px" align="left" valign="top" style="border:solid #User:Daniel/Colour I 1px; font-size:95%; padding: 3pt; background:white"|

Archives

Archives edit

101 · 102 · 103 · 104 · 105 · 106 · 107 · 108 · 109 · 110

111 · 112 · 113 · 114 · 115

ArbCase history - link needs updating

Hi Daniel, it appears that you closed the C68-FM-SV case. Within that case, a page in my userspace is linked in presentation of evidence. I have renamed the page and am repurposing the original. For continuity of the record, the two links on the evidence page should be changed to either of this or possibly this permalink.

Is that something I should just do myself without asking or should it be you making the change? And does it even matter anyway? Thanks! Franamax (talk) 21:02, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Big Sonic Heaven

Thanks for taking a look at the Big Sonic Heaven page deletion I'd asked about! Also, sorry if this isn't the place to drop a note of thanks. :) LesOrchard (talk) 03:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Editing evidence of closed case

Is this allowed after the case is closed? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 14:05, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

nu j00zerpage

u has wun. 00:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

OMG... Since when has the anti-userpage warrior/bureaucrat changed into one of the 80%-of-my-edits-are-to-the-userpage people he has long detested o.O —Dark 09:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

*gathers up evidence before Daniel spears him with his Mariners bullshit* —Dark 09:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

IRC

Please refrain from discussing me on IRC in future, I regard all logs mentioning my name to be completely fair game and my own property. Giano (talk) 18:22, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

It appears you missed the sarcasm and irony of my comments, but oh well. By the way, they aren't your own property, as I maintain copyright over everything I say in there. So they are not "your property". Daniel (talk) 10:02, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Well let's hope you never cause me to put that to the test, in the meantine stop gossiping about those that are trying to write this project. Giano (talk) 10:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Just a courtesy note – you are being discussed at WP:ANI#IRC#Admins' Abuse. - Rjd0060 (talk) 23:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

I've just had a look at this and frankly I am disgusted. You have the temerity to officiate at this and remove some of my statement with a pompous reason that it was against the rules - which prompted me to take no part and then I discover you are considerably worse than even my biggest enemies would say I was ... I presume now that your true character has been outed you will ask for my case to be reconsidered? Abtract (talk) 00:01, 2 November 2008 (UTC)