Misplaced Pages

Signature (topology): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:14, 10 November 2008 editRanicki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users602 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 08:15, 10 November 2008 edit undoRanicki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users602 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 26: Line 26:
When ''d'' is ], the same construction gives rise to an ]. Such forms do not have a signature invariant; if they are non-degenerate, any two such forms are equivalent. When ''d'' is ], the same construction gives rise to an ]. Such forms do not have a signature invariant; if they are non-degenerate, any two such forms are equivalent.


] (1954) showed that the signature of a manifold is a cobordism invariant, and in particular is given by some linear combination of its ] numbers. ] (1954) found an explicit expression for this linear combination as the ] of the manifold. ] (1962) proved that a simply-connected compact ] with ''4n''-dimensional ] is homotopy equivalent to a manifold if and only if its signature satisfies the expression of the ] ] (1954) showed that the signature of a manifold is a cobordism invariant, and in particular is given by some linear combination of its ] numbers. ] (1954) found an explicit expression for this linear combination as the ] of the manifold. (1962) proved that a simply-connected compact ] with ''4n''-dimensional ] is homotopy equivalent to a manifold if and only if its signature satisfies the expression of the ]


==See also== ==See also==

Revision as of 08:15, 10 November 2008

In mathematics, the signature of an oriented manifold M is defined when M has dimension d divisible by four. In that case, when M is connected and orientable, cup product gives rise to a quadratic form Q on the 'middle' real cohomology group

H(M,R),

where

d = 4n.

The basic identity for the cup product

α p β q = ( 1 ) p q ( β q α p ) {\displaystyle \alpha ^{p}\smile \beta ^{q}=(-1)^{pq}(\beta ^{q}\smile \alpha ^{p})}

shows that with p = q = 2n the product is commutative. It takes values in

H(M,R).

If we assume also that M is compact, Poincaré duality identifies this with

H0(M,R),

which is a one-dimensional real vector space and can be identified with R. Therefore cup product, under these hypotheses, does give rise to a symmetric bilinear form on H(M,R); and therefore to a quadratic form Q. More generally, the signature can be defined in this way for any general compact polyhedron with 4n-dimensional Poincaré duality.

The signature of M is by definition the signature of Q. If M is not connected, its signature is defined to be the sum of the signatures of its connected components. If M has dimension not divisible by 4, its signature is usually defined to be 0. The form Q is non-degenerate. This invariant of a manifold has been studied in detail, starting with Rokhlin's theorem for 4-manifolds.

When d is twice an odd integer, the same construction gives rise to an antisymmetric bilinear form. Such forms do not have a signature invariant; if they are non-degenerate, any two such forms are equivalent.

René Thom (1954) showed that the signature of a manifold is a cobordism invariant, and in particular is given by some linear combination of its Pontryagin numbers. Friedrich Hirzebruch (1954) found an explicit expression for this linear combination as the L genus of the manifold. William Browder (1962) proved that a simply-connected compact polyhedron with 4n-dimensional Poincaré duality is homotopy equivalent to a manifold if and only if its signature satisfies the expression of the Hirzebruch signature theorem

See also

Categories: