Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sir Ewan Forbes, 11th Baronet: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:32, 12 November 2008 editYobmod (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,138 edits rated B← Previous edit Revision as of 09:39, 12 November 2008 edit undoYobmod (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,138 edits rate CNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPBiography {{WPBiography
|living=no |living=no
|class=B |class=c
|priority= |priority=
}} }}
{{LGBTProject |class=B}} {{LGBTProject |class=c}}
{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk" {| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk"
|- |-
Line 18: Line 18:


also this: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/12/01/nest01.xml&sSheet=/portal/2003/12/01/ixportal.html <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> also this: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/12/01/nest01.xml&sSheet=/portal/2003/12/01/ixportal.html <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 04:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

==Rated==

I rated this article as a C. It would be B, if he was only famous for his gender, but he was also an aristzocrat, so would be notable for that anyway. Currently the article reduces him to only his gender. Sources shuold exist for all aristocratic debutants, so expanding other areas of his life should be easy. Similarly for the Barony. I'm sure there must be more to him than his gender.
] (]) 09:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)


I would be quite interested to find out his/her actual (physical) gender... <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> I would be quite interested to find out his/her actual (physical) gender... <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 09:39, 12 November 2008

WikiProject iconBiography C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconLGBTQ+ studies C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
An entry from Sir Ewan Forbes, 11th Baronet appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 30 March, 2007.
Misplaced Pages
Misplaced Pages

Comments

Interesting and curious. Was Sir Ewan intersex and assigned as a baby to the female gender only to discover that he felt male or was he a "true" woman, who simply decided to become a man? pmcray 12:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I honestly don't know. My source was a Telegraph obituary, which was very discreet about such matters. Ewan's quote suggests intersex, though - his comments seem to imply that the doctors could have registered him male but decided on female. Shimgray | talk | 12:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

also this: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/12/01/nest01.xml&sSheet=/portal/2003/12/01/ixportal.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.56.156 (talk) 04:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Rated

I rated this article as a C. It would be B, if he was only famous for his gender, but he was also an aristzocrat, so would be notable for that anyway. Currently the article reduces him to only his gender. Sources shuold exist for all aristocratic debutants, so expanding other areas of his life should be easy. Similarly for the Barony. I'm sure there must be more to him than his gender. Yobmod (talk) 09:39, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

I would be quite interested to find out his/her actual (physical) gender... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.76.209.49 (talk) 15:27, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Categories: