| Revision as of 01:45, 10 October 2005 edit62.252.132.2 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:38, 10 October 2005 edit undoMahagaja (talk | contribs)Administrators92,667 edits Gil ShahamNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Could you please give more justification for putting the ] article up for deletion? It actually seems to be a good article, and Jascha Heifetz is a very notable person. --] 15:20, 8 October 2005 (UTC) | Could you please give more justification for putting the ] article up for deletion? It actually seems to be a good article, and Jascha Heifetz is a very notable person. --] 15:20, 8 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| :Tempting to say his user page says it all. | :Tempting to say his user page says it all. | ||
| == Gil Shaham == | |||
| The same goes for ]. Continuously nominating clearly encyclopedic pages for deletion can be construed as vandalism and may lead to you being blocked or banned. --]/] 21:38, 10 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:38, 10 October 2005
Jascha Heifetz
Could you please give more justification for putting the Jascha Heifetz article up for deletion? It actually seems to be a good article, and Jascha Heifetz is a very notable person. --Alhutch 15:20, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- Tempting to say his user page says it all.
Gil Shaham
The same goes for Gil Shaham. Continuously nominating clearly encyclopedic pages for deletion can be construed as vandalism and may lead to you being blocked or banned. --Angr/tɔk tə mi 21:38, 10 October 2005 (UTC)