Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Wikipedia style and naming: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:36, 24 November 2008 editRFC bot (talk \| contribs)216,124 editsm Update, 5 current discussions← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:56, 25 November 2008 edit undoOhconfucius (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,947 edits Undid revision 253783230 by Locke Cole per WP:SPAM Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:'''		'''The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:'''

	* <strong>]</strong> Three important proposals for changing MOSNUM with respect to (1) the linking of date formats, (2) date autoformatting, and (3) requirements for auto changes **Objection, as there is a dispute as to the status quo the RfC is to change.		* <strong>]</strong> Three important proposals for changing MOSNUM with respect to (1) the linking of date formats, (2) date autoformatting, and (3) requirements for auto changes.
	* <strong>]</strong> What sources are considered reliable sources for Eurovision articles, in particular is the ESCKaz website a reliable source?		* <strong>]</strong> What sources are considered reliable sources for Eurovision articles, in particular is the ESCKaz website a reliable source?
	* <strong>]</strong> Should ] be prescriptive, or should it be a guideline, as defined in ]?		* <strong>]</strong> Should ] be prescriptive, or should it be a guideline, as defined in ]?

Revision as of 07:56, 25 November 2008

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:

Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) Three important proposals for changing MOSNUM with respect to (1) the linking of date formats, (2) date autoformatting, and (3) requirements for auto changes.
Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Eurovision What sources are considered reliable sources for Eurovision articles, in particular is the ESCKaz website a reliable source?
Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style Should WP:MOS be prescriptive, or should it be a guideline, as defined in WP:POL?
Talk:Felony disenfranchisement Disagreement over style

v t e Requests for comment (All)
Articles (All)	Biographies (bio) Economy, trade, and companies (econ) History and geography (hist) Language and linguistics (lang) Maths, science, and technology (sci) Media, the arts, and architecture (media) Politics, government, and law (pol) Religion and philosophy (reli) Society, sports, and culture (soc)
Non-articles (All)	Misplaced Pages style and naming (style) Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines (policy) WikiProjects and collaborations (proj) Misplaced Pages technical issues and templates (tech) Misplaced Pages proposals (prop) Unsorted
Instructions	To add a discussion to this list: Add the tag `{{rfc\|xxx}}` at the top of a talk page section, where "xxx" is the category abbreviation. The different category abbreviations that should be used with {{rfc}} are listed above in parenthesis. Multiple categories are separated by a vertical pipe. For example, `{{rfc\|xxx\|yyy}}`, where "xxx" is the first category and "yyy" is the second category.
For more information, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment. Report problems to Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment. Lists are updated every hour by Legobot.