Revision as of 19:17, 7 December 2008 view sourceEnkyo2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers58,409 editsm →Cui bono: tweaking← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:18, 7 December 2008 view source Enkyo2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers58,409 editsm →Cui bonoNext edit → | ||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Bluntly, <u>I have benefited</u> from your contributions. I have benefited from reading and thinking about what you have posted. | Bluntly, <u>I have benefited</u> from your contributions. I have benefited from reading and thinking about what you have posted. | ||
What reason |
What reason compels me to hesitate to post this brief THANK YOU. --] (]) 19:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:18, 7 December 2008
Clearly there is one rule for my behaviour, and one rule for everyone else's.
Don't post here. I don't want to hear it. That includes email, thanks.
Huh. What a shock.. I tell people not to harass me, and sure enough one shows up to do just that. Pathetic.
Please remove this upon reading
Roux, I'm very very sorry for posting here but I'll make it simple, do you plan on participating in the WikiCup as planned? I'm setting up tables today, and I need to know. Sorry for posting here, ayematthew ✡ 15:52, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
Cui bono
You made a constructive suggestion at diff. In my view, Cicero's Latin phrase -- Cui bono -- applies in that setting and it applies no less well here.
Cui bono = "Who benefits?"
Bluntly, I have benefited from your contributions. I have benefited from reading and thinking about what you have posted.
What reason compels me to hesitate to post this brief THANK YOU. --Tenmei (talk) 19:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC)