Misplaced Pages

Talk:Imo Incident: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:09, 22 December 2008 editCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →The title: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 13:26, 22 December 2008 edit undoCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →Massacre and No Original research: new sectionNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:


{{User|Bukubku}}, can tell me that you have any specific reason for your titling the article as '''Jingo Incident''' on this Korean history subject? Both scholarly, and commonly, the mutiny carried by ''Korean army'' occurred in ''Korea'' is much more referred to as '''Imo Incident''' or '''Imo Mutiny''' than the Japanese name. I wondered why you also missed the Korean project banner to the talk page (you only put China/Japan banners).--] 13:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC) {{User|Bukubku}}, can tell me that you have any specific reason for your titling the article as '''Jingo Incident''' on this Korean history subject? Both scholarly, and commonly, the mutiny carried by ''Korean army'' occurred in ''Korea'' is much more referred to as '''Imo Incident''' or '''Imo Mutiny''' than the Japanese name. I wondered why you also missed the Korean project banner to the talk page (you only put China/Japan banners).--] 13:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

== ] and ] ==

Bukubku, I could not find any mention about ] or ] from not only your sources but from mine. The killed people were not innocent civilians, but related figures to the incident. I recommend you to read the article of massacre because you mispresented the article regarding the ] with the unfit allegation.

On the other hand, could you quote for your claim that the China and Japan dispatched their troops for "saving Korean king"? I could not find such pertinent passage in your sources (of course not in my sources as well) which practice violates ] and ] again. You've already done several time on such things, so must be very cautious of sourcing. I corrected your wording by sticking to the attached sources.--] 13:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:26, 22 December 2008

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Imo Incident article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
WikiProject iconKorea Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJapan Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 05:21, January 9, 2025 (JST, Reiwa 7) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

WikiProject iconChina Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The title

Bukubku (talk · contribs), can tell me that you have any specific reason for your titling the article as Jingo Incident on this Korean history subject? Both scholarly, and commonly, the mutiny carried by Korean army occurred in Korea is much more referred to as Imo Incident or Imo Mutiny than the Japanese name. I wondered why you also missed the Korean project banner to the talk page (you only put China/Japan banners).--Caspian blue 13:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Massacre and No Original research

Bukubku, I could not find any mention about Massacre or Genocide from not only your sources but from mine. The killed people were not innocent civilians, but related figures to the incident. I recommend you to read the article of massacre because you mispresented the article regarding the mutiny with the unfit allegation.

On the other hand, could you quote for your claim that the China and Japan dispatched their troops for "saving Korean king"? I could not find such pertinent passage in your sources (of course not in my sources as well) which practice violates Wiki:No original research and Wiki:SYNTHESIS again. You've already done several time on such things, so must be very cautious of sourcing. I corrected your wording by sticking to the attached sources.--Caspian blue 13:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Categories: