Misplaced Pages

:Wheel war: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:58, 2 December 2008 editFranamax (talk | contribs)18,113 edits Undid revision 255349093 by Cla68 (talk) rv - will follow up on talk← Previous edit Revision as of 06:20, 23 December 2008 edit undoElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,960 edits Adding note about ArbCom enforcement motionNext edit →
Line 22: Line 22:


Misplaced Pages works on the spirit of ]; disputes should be settled through civil discussion rather than power wrestling. Misplaced Pages works on the spirit of ]; disputes should be settled through civil discussion rather than power wrestling.

==ArbCom enforcement==
In November 2008, the ] passed ] which stated that administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except:
:(a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or
:(b) following a clear, substantial, and active community consensus to do so.


== See also == == See also ==

Revision as of 06:20, 23 December 2008

WP:WW redirects here; you may also be looking for Misplaced Pages:Avoid weasel words (shortcut: WP:AWW) or Misplaced Pages:WikiProject WikipediaWeekly (shortcut: WP:WWPC).
This page documents an English Misplaced Pages policy.It describes a widely accepted standard that editors should normally follow, though exceptions may apply. Changes made to it should reflect consensus.Shortcuts

A wheel war is a struggle between two or more administrators in which they undo one another's administrative actions — specifically, unblocking and reblocking a user; undeleting and redeleting; or unprotecting and reprotecting a page. Do not repeat an administrative action when you know that another administrator opposes it. Do not continue a chain of administrative reversals without discussion.

Sanctions applied by the Arbitration Committee and by Jimbo Wales for wheel warring have varied from reprimands and cautions, to temporary blocks, to desysopping, even for first time incidents. Wheel warring has been used as grounds for immediate revocation of adminship following Arbitration in a number of cases. For summaries and citations of relevant arbitration cases, and example scenarios, see /Examples.

Possible indications and alternatives

Possible indications of wheel warring are:

  • Administrators getting too distressed to discuss something.
  • An administrator undoes another administrator's actions without consultation.
  • An administrator deliberately ignores an existing discussion (often at the Administrators noticeboard/Incidents or Deletion review) and implements their own preferred action or version of an edit.
  • An administrative action is repeatedly performed and reversed (by anyone).

If you feel the need to wheel war, try these alternatives:

Misplaced Pages works on the spirit of consensus; disputes should be settled through civil discussion rather than power wrestling.

ArbCom enforcement

In November 2008, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion which stated that administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except:

(a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or
(b) following a clear, substantial, and active community consensus to do so.

See also

External links

Categories: