Misplaced Pages

Talk:Imo Incident: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:02, 23 December 2008 editBukubku (talk | contribs)2,327 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:45, 24 December 2008 edit undoCaspian blue (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,434 edits →The titleNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:


{{User|Bukubku}}, can tell me why you titled the article as '''Jingo Incident''' on this Korean history subject? Both scholarly, and commonly, the mutiny carried by ''Korean army'' occurred in ''Korea'' is much more referred to as '''Imo Incident''' or '''Imo Mutiny''' than the Japanese name. I wondered why you also missed the Korean project banner to the talk page (you only put China/Japan banners).--] 13:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC) {{User|Bukubku}}, can tell me why you titled the article as '''Jingo Incident''' on this Korean history subject? Both scholarly, and commonly, the mutiny carried by ''Korean army'' occurred in ''Korea'' is much more referred to as '''Imo Incident''' or '''Imo Mutiny''' than the Japanese name. I wondered why you also missed the Korean project banner to the talk page (you only put China/Japan banners).--] 13:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
:I know the incident title as 壬午事変, so I wrote "Jingo Incident". This page was the first time for me to creat new page related history, so I refered to other page. The page was china-japan related page. That's all. Soon {{User|Caspian blue}} added korean project banner. That's enough, isn't it? Are you accusing me of such a tiny thing?--] (]) 13:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC) :I know the incident title as 壬午事変, so I wrote "Jingo Incident". This page was the first time for me to creat new page related history, so I refered to other page. The page was china-japan related page. That's all. Soon {{User|Caspian blue}} added korean project banner. That's enough, isn't it? Are you accusing me of such a tiny thing?--] (]) 13:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
::{{Bukubku}}, again, saying falsely things that I did not say constitutes ]. Where did you find my accusation from my above "question"? You have a tendency to distort other people's comment (including sources) and easily jump to pour such attacks as you did call me or any authors you do not like a "racist". Please do not do that.

::FYI, the incident is more known as "壬午軍乱(亂)" than even 壬午事変 even in Japanese according to web searches. One of your source written in English does not even refer it to as "Jingo Incident". The title, categories, and banners are not tiny things because you mispresented that the article is only a matter of China-Japan as missing to put pertinent Korean categories to the article. You should've checked and research for possible titles on the subject before creating the article. People who want to know some subjects would have a difficult time to find them if they're named wrong or uncommon one. That is far from a "tiny thing"--] 17:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


== ] and ] == == ] and ] ==

Revision as of 17:45, 24 December 2008

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Imo Incident article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
WikiProject iconKorea Stub‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconJapan Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 05:05, January 9, 2025 (JST, Reiwa 7) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

WikiProject iconChina Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The title

Bukubku (talk · contribs), can tell me why you titled the article as Jingo Incident on this Korean history subject? Both scholarly, and commonly, the mutiny carried by Korean army occurred in Korea is much more referred to as Imo Incident or Imo Mutiny than the Japanese name. I wondered why you also missed the Korean project banner to the talk page (you only put China/Japan banners).--Caspian blue 13:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I know the incident title as 壬午事変, so I wrote "Jingo Incident". This page was the first time for me to creat new page related history, so I refered to other page. The page was china-japan related page. That's all. Soon Caspian blue (talk · contribs) added korean project banner. That's enough, isn't it? Are you accusing me of such a tiny thing?--Bukubku (talk) 13:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Template:Bukubku, again, saying falsely things that I did not say constitutes WP:Personal attack. Where did you find my accusation from my above "question"? You have a tendency to distort other people's comment (including sources) and easily jump to pour such attacks as you did call me or any authors you do not like a "racist". Please do not do that.
FYI, the incident is more known as "壬午軍乱(亂)" than even 壬午事変 even in Japanese according to web searches. One of your source written in English does not even refer it to as "Jingo Incident". The title, categories, and banners are not tiny things because you mispresented that the article is only a matter of China-Japan as missing to put pertinent Korean categories to the article. You should've checked and research for possible titles on the subject before creating the article. People who want to know some subjects would have a difficult time to find them if they're named wrong or uncommon one. That is far from a "tiny thing"--Caspian blue 17:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Massacre and No Original research

Bukubku, I could not find any mention about Massacre or Genocide from not only your sources but from mine. The killed people were not innocent civilians, but related figures to the incident. I recommend you to read the article of massacre because you mispresented the article regarding the mutiny with the unfit allegation.

On the other hand, could you quote for your claim that the China and Japan dispatched their troops for "saving Korean king"? I could not find such pertinent passage in your sources (of course not in my sources as well) which practice violates Wiki:No original research and Wiki:SYNTHESIS again. You've already done several time on such things, so must be very cautious of sourcing. I corrected your wording by sticking to the attached sources.--Caspian blue 13:26, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Genocide? I have never said such word in Misplaced Pages. Your words "The killed people were not innocent civilians, but related figures to the incident." is half right and half wrong. Half is Yes, they were killed by Koreans in the incident, you could say they were related the incident. Half is Not, there were students who studied Korean language. There is cabinet meeting document. Certainly, there was Japanese Army officer existed who died for Korean modernization. The words "saving Korean king" is right. The rebel army was collapsed by Qing troops. Sadly, Japanse troops didn't reach Soeul in time, so Japanese troops could not save people. Because Japanese troops was not stationed in Korea.--Bukubku (talk) 13:02, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Categories: