Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tanthalas39: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:51, 30 December 2008 editAnmaFinotera (talk | contribs)107,494 edits →Bambifan101 favorite targets: reply← Previous edit Revision as of 16:52, 30 December 2008 edit undo65.0.174.166 (talk) →Bambifan101 favorite targetsNext edit →
Line 145: Line 145:
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]


Revision as of 16:52, 30 December 2008

Wait! Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? Click here before leaving a message to find out why.

Archiving icon
Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

AGF

Being an administrator, I cannot imagine that I have to reel off about assuming good faith, which this comment did not. Administrators are not exempt from being nice, and to be honest it would help the encyclopedia if they were more courteous more of the time - and that edit was neither courteous nor necessary, it was merely inflammatory. I have disputed with Ottava in the past, and do not agree with him, but it is my belief that such a comment is unwarranted. Regards, — neuro 01:14, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Let me say right now that I am a jerk, and characterizing me as such is only stating reality. AGF would be assuming that I am being a jerk for a decent reason. Regardless, it doesn't matter. Ottava Rima (talk) 01:16, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm a jerk, too. I also wasn't disagreeing with Ottava's comments on that linked page, and I'm pretty sure from my past observations that he can take being called a jerk. Take that crap off my talk page, Neuro. I couldn't care less what you think about my comment. Tan | 39 01:21, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Whether Ottava agrees with you or not is irrelevant, it is unacceptable for an admin to set such an example to prospective users and others. Administrators are representatives of the community, and acting in such a way is not a wise idea. If you want to take it off of your talk page, go ahead, but I sure won't. — neuro 01:24, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Go the f*ck away, Neuro. Merry Christmas. Tan | 39 01:25, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
And a very merry Christmas to you too, sir. Hoping you are well, — neuro 01:43, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
That's not exactly helpful... Nick (talk) 01:44, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
It's totally fine, Nick. Now you're catching on, N. For all our differences, Ase- I mean, Neuro, have a great holiday. Tan | 39 01:45, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
You too. I like how this sort of rounded off to a pleasant ending. :) — neuro 01:49, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas. :) Ottava Rima (talk) 06:07, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Edessa

Hello, can you explain your reason for undoing my edits in this article? The individual is not notable. Even though it is bluelinked, his article cites no sources, therefore per WP:NOTABLE, this individual is not notable. No coverage in reliable, secondary sources indepedent of the subject are given. The guys is a nobody. I would nominate his BLP for deletion, but just don't have the time for it. --Tsourkpk (talk) 17:26, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Your response here seems very, very typical of your militant, "I'm always right" attitude here on the project. You don't have time for it? I won't even distinguish that with a reply. Tan | 39 17:36, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Battle of Harlem Heights

Hi, I posted here a couple of weeks ago but I guess you missed it so I'll just post it again.

I saw on you user page that you intend to expand the Battle of Harlem Heights. Being from the area, I have also thought about doing some work on it. When do you plan to start? I would be willing to help.-Kieran4 (talk) 23:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Sorry for missing your previous post. I'd love to expand that to at least B-class. As I did with Landing at Kip's Bay, I have four or five references (the same as on that page) that I will be using, relying heavily on McCullough's 1776. What do you think? Do you have other references as well? Tan | 39 23:45, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
I also have 1776. Another book I have is General George Washington by Edward G. Lengel. It covers the battle in about a page and a half. The book goes over every major engagement that Washington was involved in during the war, including Kip's Bay and Harlem Heights. Beyond that, there is The Battle of Harlem Heights, September 16, 1776 by Henry Phelps Johnston which is available on google books. It is quite old, 1897, but unlike most books on google books, all the text is available. It looks like it was used a little bit for the article already. Beyond that I don't have too much.-Kieran4 (talk) 00:03, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

My Winnipeg Protected.

Okay, see you new years day after 23:24 GMT/UTC, assuming Linux or Macs does not have a Y2K9 problem. Dang it for blocking the Tor_(anonymity_network). 142.161.178.219 (talk) 12:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Some Winnipeg Vandal.

Season's Greetings

Wishing you the very best for the season. Guettarda (talk) 01:27, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

SOrry dude...

at least they made the game interesting. StarM 21:45, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

stopping by to make the same condolences. Nobody should have to suffer through that type of season. Except perhaps Dallas fans. They should suffer. Or Packer fans. Always next year. Keeper ǀ 76 04:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
and media here are surprised he got canned. I think Mangini was the only semi-surprise of the lot. At least it got the media off Favre's case. Hey Keep, do me a favour and saute the birds please? StarM 02:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Also sorry dude ...

I will try and be a good little editor in future. I still think that the Reagan article is biased but I am outnumbered. I was in Arizona last year. It's a fine state, if a bit heavy on the non-smoking. May your saguaros never grow thin.  SmokeyTheCat  •TALK• 09:55, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Bambifan101 favorite targets

I dewatch listed them all, so not completely sure which ones are currently protected or not protected, but this is a fairly comprehensive list (though sometimes he pops over to other articles just for kicks, and new Disney articles are also often new targets). For each one, he also regularly attacks the talk pages and talk archives:

Some articles/redirects he tends to recreate:

He is also fond of vandalizing his old IP and named sock user pages, clearing them our, or copy/pasting one to another. He likes to pop into AN/I and other discussions about him, usually under a new named account, and will vandalize AfDs or the like on articles within his playground. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

All protected. In the future, think about coming directly to me instead of to RFPP. Tan | 39 16:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. When this AN/I thread is done, though, I'll probably just get back out of this again. I don't want the stress of dealing with him, especially with other editors now helping him then accusing me of causing him to act this way. *sigh* -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 16:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Bless you.

...for indef-protecting Teletubbies and Barney and Friends. GJC 16:21, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Check out the list above that I'm indef semi-protecting :-) Tan | 39 16:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)