| Revision as of 14:38, 4 January 2009 editKnulclunk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,267 edits →ANI← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:12, 4 January 2009 edit undoOsamaK (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,183 edits →ANI: [Next edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| :::: Feel free to comment. I just saw some people anti-religions, some anti Obama\McCain\Bush and others, other anti Nazism, I thought it would be OK as well.--]]] 10:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | :::: Feel free to comment. I just saw some people anti-religions, some anti Obama\McCain\Bush and others, other anti Nazism, I thought it would be OK as well.--]]] 10:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::I've seen the anti-bush/obama images deleted at image review for that reason. I think the world is a nicer place if we keep it off the user pages. If people want to userbox themselves as atheist, well that is their choice.--] (]) 14:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | :::I've seen the anti-bush/obama images deleted at image review for that reason. I think the world is a nicer place if we keep it off the user pages. If people want to userbox themselves as atheist, well that is their choice.--] (]) 14:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :::: But this image was kept fairly after discussing the policy on Commons, IRC and mail. It's your option if you think that we must not anti the "holy promise land" of Israel, but as you just said, it's "your choice", and will never be mine. It's my choice to anti Israel, with fully respect for our articles ] and welcoming our Israeli contributors as contributors. Again, please feel free to comment and declear you point of view, you can always use this page, IRC or mail, and please note that ] here to ].--]]] 18:12, 4 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == OKBot == | == OKBot == | ||
Revision as of 18:12, 4 January 2009
 Archives | ||
Index
| ||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Don't tell me that sources are not required for PDs. We do have clear policies!
ANI
You ahve been named at a discussion at ANI here ].Die4Dixie (talk) 10:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Again, thank you! I'm there.--OsamaK 10:13, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Good. I certainly don't agree that it is a racist symbol. Nor a symbol of religious bigotry. It simply means you don't like Israeli flags.Die4Dixie (talk) 10:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- Er. We've worked together before, so I saw you're updates... Careful Misplaced Pages:User page is pretty clear......--Knulclunk (talk) 04:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Feel free to comment. I just saw some people anti-religions, some anti Obama\McCain\Bush and others, other anti Nazism, I thought it would be OK as well.--OsamaK 10:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I've seen the anti-bush/obama images deleted at image review for that reason. I think the world is a nicer place if we keep it off the user pages. If people want to userbox themselves as atheist, well that is their choice.--Knulclunk (talk) 14:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- But this image was kept fairly after discussing the policy on Commons, IRC and mail. It's your option if you think that we must not anti the "holy promise land" of Israel, but as you just said, it's "your choice", and will never be mine. It's my choice to anti Israel, with fully respect for our articles NPOV and welcoming our Israeli contributors as contributors. Again, please feel free to comment and declear you point of view, you can always use this page, IRC or mail, and please note that we're all here to work.--OsamaK 18:12, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Er. We've worked together before, so I saw you're updates... Careful Misplaced Pages:User page is pretty clear......--Knulclunk (talk) 04:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Good. I certainly don't agree that it is a racist symbol. Nor a symbol of religious bigotry. It simply means you don't like Israeli flags.Die4Dixie (talk) 10:15, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
OKBot
Morning! OKBot added an interwikilink in the middle of a discussion at WP:ANI, and at some other noticeboards, so without knowing if it was an error or not I pointed it out here. Cheers, --aktsu 09:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)