Misplaced Pages

User talk:Slakr: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:56, 11 January 2009 editSlakr (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators33,695 edits +reply← Previous edit Revision as of 10:57, 11 January 2009 edit undo24.26.240.164 (talk) Replaced content with 'KURT’S TEXAN ANUS IS STRETCHED AND WIDENED BY GRAWP’S MASSIVE COCK'Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
KURT’S TEXAN ANUS IS STRETCHED AND WIDENED BY GRAWP’S MASSIVE COCK
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 11
|algo = old(7d)
|archive = User talk:Slakr/Archive %(counter)d
}}{{administrator}}{{DISPLAYTITLE:User talk:slakr}}

{| class="messagebox standard" style=background:#FFD0CC
|-
|]
|style="text-align:center"|'''slakr''''s life is currently ], so his activity and response times to queries will be highly variable. <br />Leave a message and he will respond whenever he gets a chance&mdash; that is, assuming he gets a chance. Cheers =)<br /><small>] &mdash; ] &mdash; ]</small>
|-
|}

----

:] Ideally, please {{highlight|at the '''bottom'''}}. If you can't find something you recently posted, I might have moved it down there or it could have been archived if you posted it over 7 days ago. Cheers :)

----
<div id="talk" class="plainlinks" style="border: 1px solid #CC9; margin: 0em 1em 0em 1em; text-align: center; padding:5px; clear: both; background-color: #F1F1DE"><div style="padding-right:20px; display:inline;">{{{icon|] }}}</div>Welcome to my talk page. Please ] your entries by inserting '''<nowiki> ~~</nowiki>~~''' at the end.<br />
''''''
</div>

{| class="messagebox {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{TALKSPACE}}|{{#ifeq:{{{small|}}}|yes|small|standard}}-talk}}" style="{{#if:{{{width|}}}|width: {{{width|}}};}}{{#if:{{{bgcolor|}}}|background-color: {{{bgcolor|}}};}}"
| style="font-size: x-small; text-align: center; margin: 0; padding: 0;" class="plainlinks"|
| style="border-bottom: 1px solid DimGray; font-size: larger;" |'''] (FAQ)''' {{#if:{{{see also|}}}|(see also: {{{see also}}})}}
|-
| valign="top" |]
|width="100%"|
{{User:Slakr/FAQ}}
|}

{{Archivebox|auto=long}}
__TOC__

== Thank you ==

Thank you for deleting ]. You are right, that mistake was caused by my script. Thanks. :) — <small><b><span style="border:1px solid #20406F;padding:1px 3px;font-family:Verdana,sans-serif;">]</span></b></small> <span style="color: #999;">//</span>&nbsp;] 00:32, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

== Deletion -- Żądło-Dąbrowski z Dąbrówki h. Radwan ==

While the deletion debate raged, I moved this article Radwan Dąbrowski-Żądło to

Żądło-Dąbrowski z Dąbrówki h. Radwan.

That was an attempt to fix what I considered surmountable problems within the article. SEE:

]

The administrator who made the original deletion nomination has two recent arbitration cases against him, and he has since lost his administrator privileges.

My point -- I want a deletion review on the newly rewritten article "Żądło-Dąbrowski z Dąbrówki h. Radwan", but it's probably pointing to the old article "Radwan Dąbrowski-Żądło."

Everything seems to be mixed up. Any suggestions on how to proceed?

I can't see the old article, so I don't want the old contents reviewed.

Thanks -- ] (]) 01:01, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
:First and foremost, the closing admin, {{User|Aitias}}, is . As such, that's good enough for me to enforce his deletion closure. Whether or not the nominator is or is not an administrator is irrelevant to me as I'm not the closing administrator&mdash; Aitias is.

:The result of the delete discussion on the article that was being discussed was to delete it. Moving it to a new name doesn't reverse that decision nor does recreating it under a new name, which qualifies the article for ]. A lot of admins use an AfD closing script to automagically delete articles discussed in an AfD should the result of the discussion be to delete. Naturally, since the article had been moved in the interim, the script simply deleted the redirect left behind by he move, and I cleaned up.

:If, however, you feel that the article, under whatever name, should be undeleted, the dudes at ] should be able to help you out. I added comments to both the AfD and the deletes I made in order to help clarify what happened. My guess is it would be easiest to do everything as if you hadn't moved it, i.e., reference the actual AfD that closed as delete, then explain that the new name would be at "the new name". Also, be sure to state why the new incarnation fundamentally addresses the concerns of the AfD that resulted in delete.

:--]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 01:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

== SineBot at en.wikinews ==

Hello, I just wanted to let you know that the SineBot at the English Wikinews seems to be broken. It hasn't been working for a month (). Perhaps you could get it working again? Thanks, <span style="background:Lavender;border:1px solid green">&nbsp;♪]<span style="color:Green">Di</span>]♪&nbsp;</span> 18:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
:Have been in the process of slowly moving them over to a new server. I'll get it back up soon. --]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 08:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

== Exclude pages under Wikipedia_talk:Articles for Creation? ==

Hi slakr,

I noticed that SineBot signed an article that was in the Articles for Creation queue . Since these are technically talk pages, but they could become actual articles eventually, I wonder if SineBot should be modified so that it doesn't modify pages under the AfC category? Thanks, ] (]) 06:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
:I've explicitly hardcoded an exception for now as a kludge. :P The categorization of the AfC process under the Misplaced Pages talk: namespace (a change that looks like it occurred within the last few months) is where the problem originated. It should ignore any page starting with Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Submissions/ now. --]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 08:51, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

== Seth Sabal Photographer ==

Hello,
Can you please tell me how to have my deleted page restored?
I wrote an artical yesterday about a photographer named Seth Sabal. I followed all the rules and established "notablity", sourced all my references and it was deleted.
I think this might be a bias delete, based on old posts. I dont even know how about having this fixed, I think it should be included.
Now the editors are insinuating some things about my grammer, and I feel so angry. This is supposed to be a great resource for students like myself,
Its even our class assignement to make a Wiki article. I am flabbergasted that it been so difficult with all the correct reference links and obvious notability. ] (]) 20:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Can you please help me.
:It was the subject of an ]. Please see the following for more info: ]. If you feel that the page was deleted incorrectly or the concerns raised by the deletion discussion are now fixed, please see ], which outlines what to do next. --]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 08:56, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

== Sinebot causing double signatures ==

Sinebot added two signatures it shouldn't have added ( and ) and I am removing them. In both cases there was already a clear signature with datestamp, resulting in posts with double signatures. Sinebot may have been confused because the signatures did not match the editor's name: the editor was just restoring previously deleted comments. --] (]) 03:07, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
:The user signed as another user; ] != ], thus the signature was invalid. --]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 05:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

== New Option Suggested ==

I don't worry too much about signing things on talk pages because I know SineBot will sign for me. Recently, I forgot to sign a bunch of things and SineBot posted a message on my talk page reminding me to sign. This made me think it might be nice to have a third option for SineBot. {{t1|AutoSignOK}} If this tag is present on a person's user or talk page, SineBot replaces the clunky:

Sample Comment <small>-- Preceding unsigned comment added by Name (talk) 00:00, 1 January 2009 (UTC)</small>

with:

Sample Comment -- Name (talk) 00:00, 1 January 2009 (UTC) <small>''autosigned''</small>

P.S. I agree with the above poster who said the message about not signing is a bit condescending. Could be improved.

] (]) 07:44, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

== delta lodge ==

i left an imparial and factual account of he delta lodge page that was deleted, why was it so. I thought wiki pedia was all about fact i even provided sources from reputable journalists and city council meetings. I am starting to think that you guys are partisan apologists.... let the people read the facts and decide for them selves..... is this an encyclopedia or a commercial? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 21:44, 10 January 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
# I have&mdash;well, had&mdash; no involvement in that page. However, since you felt it necessary to draw me in, it's pretty apparent you've created several accounts to advance your point of view. As a result, I've semi-protected the page and blocked this account.
# Please read our ]. Also please see our ], ], and ].
# Evading blocks will result in an even smaller likelihood of whatever it is you're trying to insert being inserted, as we highly frown upon ].
:--]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 23:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

==Unknown vandal comment==
"]"
# Hot.
# Can I get the movie rights to this? It'll be like Brokeback Mountain&mdash; except on Misplaced Pages. We can make really bad puns in it as well, like "y'all ] ] now, ya hear?" and "everything's ] in Texas, from our vast stretches of wide'n'open anus' to our massive ]!" The spooge scene could involve the yelling of "yeehaw!"
# Already stretched'n'widened after what felt like giving birth the other day. Thought about taking a picture but decided against it.
: Cheers. :P --]<small><sup>\&nbsp;]&nbsp;/</sup></small> 10:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:57, 11 January 2009

KURT’S TEXAN ANUS IS STRETCHED AND WIDENED BY GRAWP’S MASSIVE COCK