Revision as of 06:06, 17 January 2009 view sourceEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,229 edits →ANI notice: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:01, 17 January 2009 view source Kww (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers82,486 edits please stop moving articlesNext edit → | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:WP:ANI#User page wandered into mainspace|The discussion is about the topic ].}} <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 06:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC) | Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. {{#if:WP:ANI#User page wandered into mainspace|The discussion is about the topic ].}} <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 06:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Please stop moving things without discussion == | |||
If you had asked someone, we could have told you that ] and ] link to the same place, and that the display of the first character as a lower case "i" is accomplished through some special macros on the title page. I'm happy to answer questions about things, but every time you do one of these unnecessary moves, you create some side effects that other people have to clean up. Please stop.—](]) 18:01, 17 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:01, 17 January 2009
User talk:203.45.49.142
Policy does not prohibit users, including both registered and anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages. Unless they're removing declined unblock requests, confirmed sockpuppetry notices, or shared IP header templates...there is no reason for you to restore what they've removed. --Onorem♠Dil 00:32, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- One of the administrators wants it there. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 00:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- And? They have no reason to revert the anon either. --Onorem♠Dil 00:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Okay... I guess I understand now. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 00:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Also note, JBsupreme is not an admin...not that it matters. --Onorem♠Dil 00:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- I see. His profile sure makes it look like he is one. XD - Eugene Krabs (talk) 00:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Also note, JBsupreme is not an admin...not that it matters. --Onorem♠Dil 00:38, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Full names
Please stop moving articles to the full names of the individuals involved. Articles are placed under the most commonly used name, not the full name.—Kww(talk) 05:26, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- That does make sense. Thanks for the comment. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 05:27, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
ANI notice
Hello, Amaury. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic WP:ANI#User page wandered into mainspace. Thank you. EdJohnston (talk) 06:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Please stop moving things without discussion
If you had asked someone, we could have told you that iCarly and ICarly link to the same place, and that the display of the first character as a lower case "i" is accomplished through some special macros on the title page. I'm happy to answer questions about things, but every time you do one of these unnecessary moves, you create some side effects that other people have to clean up. Please stop.—Kww(talk) 18:01, 17 January 2009 (UTC)