| Revision as of 12:03, 10 January 2009 editDoug Weller (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators264,261 edits →Bronze Age: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:26, 27 January 2009 edit undoJdorney (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers10,246 edits →Third opinion?: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| I've removed the Central Asia stuff as the article it's based on doesn't seem to exist. See the talk page where I also say that Keys isn't the best of sources. Mind you, the recent Inca edit is dodgy, not just the reference but I thought bronze smelting might be older than the Inca. ] (]) 12:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC) | I've removed the Central Asia stuff as the article it's based on doesn't seem to exist. See the talk page where I also say that Keys isn't the best of sources. Mind you, the recent Inca edit is dodgy, not just the reference but I thought bronze smelting might be older than the Inca. ] (]) 12:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Third opinion? == | |||
| Hi, I see you're listed as a third opinion wikipedian and I'd like to have your opinion on a pretty contentious article, the ], which involved the deaths of up to 14 people in April 1922 in Ireland. I don't want to colour your judgment before you read the piece with further comments, so I'll just say, that I favour this version and another user favours this one . Debate is here ]. Not tremendously civil on either side I regret to say, but I feel certain users have not been engaging with the issues in good faith. Regards ] (]) 15:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:26, 27 January 2009
 Archives |
castletown
can you show me how i went wrong with my edit please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.209.4 (talk) 10:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Alexander Fiske-Harrison
That's a little harsh, warning a user for blanking a COI page they created about themselves rather than apply db-blank to it. I've reverted it back then tagged it appropriately. --Blowdart | 18:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I agree in part but s/he was messing around creating gratuitous pages and I applied the wrong warning message inadvertently. I see the page has now been deleted anyway.--Calabraxthis 19:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Bronze Age
I've removed the Central Asia stuff as the article it's based on doesn't seem to exist. See the talk page where I also say that Keys isn't the best of sources. Mind you, the recent Inca edit is dodgy, not just the reference but I thought bronze smelting might be older than the Inca. dougweller (talk) 12:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Third opinion?
Hi, I see you're listed as a third opinion wikipedian and I'd like to have your opinion on a pretty contentious article, the Dunmanway Massacre, which involved the deaths of up to 14 people in April 1922 in Ireland. I don't want to colour your judgment before you read the piece with further comments, so I'll just say, that I favour this version and another user favours this one . Debate is here Talk:Dunmanway Massacre. Not tremendously civil on either side I regret to say, but I feel certain users have not been engaging with the issues in good faith. Regards Jdorney (talk) 15:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC)