| Revision as of 13:44, 28 January 2009 editUsrnme h8er (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers2,319 edits moving admin not "into" AfD for clarity reasons← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:51, 28 January 2009 edit undoRenamed user 1579654863 (talk | contribs)32,952 edits →Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments: deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| *'''Delete''' Fails ], redundant and biased version of ]--] - <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 22:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Fails ], redundant and biased version of ]--] - <sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 22:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' POV fork. ] (]) 00:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' POV fork. ] (]) 00:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' POV fork. ] (]) 13:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:51, 28 January 2009
Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments
Administrator note Reopened debate per request by User:Abd at my talk page. — Aitias // discussion 13:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Yet another POV fork from Pcarbonn's attempts to boost cold fusion. Most of the rest were cleaned up some time ago, obviously this one got missed. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Cold fusion for the gory details. This gives undue weight to one aspect of a subject that is covered more neutrally by the day at cold fusion. Guy (Help!) 21:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly a content fork. No material worth merging into cold fusion article. -Atmoz (talk) 22:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete POV fork. Verbal chat 22:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NPOV, redundant and biased version of cold fusion--Patar knight - /contributions 22:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete POV fork. Vsmith (talk) 00:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete POV fork. kilbad (talk) 13:51, 28 January 2009 (UTC)