Misplaced Pages

Talk:Saddlebacking: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:13, 29 January 2009 editJohnnr2 (talk | contribs)2 edits comment← Previous edit Revision as of 22:15, 29 January 2009 edit undoMike Doughney (talk | contribs)3,646 editsm adds talkheader since this page is getting garbled with unsigned out of order commentsNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talkheader}}

I disagree and think an entry should be open. There are urban dictionary defintion dates that supercede Dan's definition. This isn't just HIS word. It's A WORD and has been used in slang for awhile compared to the dates of submissions. I disagree and think an entry should be open. There are urban dictionary defintion dates that supercede Dan's definition. This isn't just HIS word. It's A WORD and has been used in slang for awhile compared to the dates of submissions.



Revision as of 22:15, 29 January 2009

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Saddlebacking redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

I disagree and think an entry should be open. There are urban dictionary defintion dates that supercede Dan's definition. This isn't just HIS word. It's A WORD and has been used in slang for awhile compared to the dates of submissions.


Example.

A position that gay men love Ohh, I heard Neil wanted to ride Bob Saddleback..Ouch!

Jul 29, 2003

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=saddleback


This word can be used many different ways and has many possibilities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.61.220.122 (talk) 21:19, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion arguments go here Noble Spear (talk) 21:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
If enough citations can be found to make a successful comparison to the notability of "Santorum" and "Pegging" as coined by Dan Savage, then an argument can be made that this should definitely not be deleted. But it seems like it will take some more evidence of notability than what's been presented so far. Are there more articles in mainstream press which mention "Saddlebacking" in reference to "Santorum" discussions, etc? Thanks. Teledildonix314 04:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Oh, actually, i've easily found some more press here -- http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/01/22/yes_we_can_saddelbacking_make
So if it does actually appear to be mentioned in Reliable Sources such as The Economist then i would assume it's quite notable and should definitely not be deleted. Teledildonix314 04:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Existed without a name

This practice has gone on for years without a proper name. At my (small private) college, I met multiple people who had saddlebacked in order to maintain a reputation. You can read more about this odd phenomenon here Gary Seven (talk) 17:22, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

A google search reveals that usage is picking up at a fast pace. Leave it as is.

  1. http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Story?id=6428003
  2. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/21606.php