| Revision as of 08:07, 30 January 2009 editKnowledgeHegemonyPart2 (talk | contribs)3,439 edits →Barny: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:54, 31 January 2009 edit undoBiruitorul (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers148,329 edits +Next edit → | ||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
| I'd like to move this to an appropriate title, as one of the articles (]) needs a move, due to a cleanup of the article. ] needs to be called ], as DAB & online coverage is rising to the FM listening stage, therefore correcting the name. Please write back. ] (]) 19:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | I'd like to move this to an appropriate title, as one of the articles (]) needs a move, due to a cleanup of the article. ] needs to be called ], as DAB & online coverage is rising to the FM listening stage, therefore correcting the name. Please write back. ] (]) 19:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :Erm, no, it's fine as it is. --] (]) 02:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC) | :Erm, no, it's fine as it is. --] (]) 02:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello -- let's have this debate, shall we? Let's grant that a hamlet of 700 souls has notability. But given that at no point in the near future is that "article" likely to expand beyond a line or two (certainly neither you nor I will be doing any meaningful expansion), ''why on earth not'' simply have a redirect to the parent commune article (]), which, for all its faults, does at least have some content, at least pertains to a commune with a mayor, a school, etc., and says ''exactly'' what the Cristelec "article" says? What do we lose that way? | |||
Revision as of 15:54, 31 January 2009
Closedmouth is
Somewhere
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
| This is Closedmouth's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
 | Thanks in advance to anyone who reverts vandalism in my userspace, it'd get a little tedious if I thanked everyone on their talk page every time |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Misplaced Pages Signpost, January 24, 2009
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 03:47, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)
That image....
Firstly, ARGGHHH!! Jimbo still scares me. Secondly, we never did have any luck with that image? ;( — Realist 01:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Barny
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| Thanks indeed for reverting the vandalism edits on Misplaced Pages again and again! —KnowledgeHegemony 15:07, 26 January 2009 (UTC) |
- Thank you jesus. --Closedmouth (talk) 15:26, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- Jesus? —KnowledgeHegemony 17:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes? --Closedmouth (talk) 06:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oh thank you jesus, as in "Thank you God"! My bad! Very bad! —KnowledgeHegemony 08:07, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes? --Closedmouth (talk) 06:23, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Jesus? —KnowledgeHegemony 17:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
The Wave
I'd like to move this to an appropriate title, as one of the articles (96.4 The Wave) needs a move, due to a cleanup of the article. 96.4 The Wave needs to be called The Wave, as DAB & online coverage is rising to the FM listening stage, therefore correcting the name. Please write back. Jonny7003 (talk) 19:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Erm, no, it's fine as it is. --Closedmouth (talk) 02:40, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Cristelec
Hello -- let's have this debate, shall we? Let's grant that a hamlet of 700 souls has notability. But given that at no point in the near future is that "article" likely to expand beyond a line or two (certainly neither you nor I will be doing any meaningful expansion), why on earth not simply have a redirect to the parent commune article (Măerişte), which, for all its faults, does at least have some content, at least pertains to a commune with a mayor, a school, etc., and says exactly what the Cristelec "article" says? What do we lose that way?