Revision as of 00:14, 30 January 2009 editChamal N (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,697 edits →New messages: true← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:33, 31 January 2009 edit undoEnkyo2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers58,409 edits "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."Next edit → | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:::True. I don't have a problem with that, just thought I'd let you know. Cheers and happy editing :) ] ] 00:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC) | :::True. I don't have a problem with that, just thought I'd let you know. Cheers and happy editing :) ] ] 00:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
==Comment== | |||
<u>I invite no action or comment</u>, please; but I wonder if it might be worthwhile for you to examine what I have posted as a "comment" at ]? Plausibly useful? --] (]) 22:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:33, 31 January 2009
You have new messages (last change).
I do tend to delete messages when they are no longer relevant, so don't take offence if/when your message goes the way of the dodo
New messages
Hi there, Sennen goroshi! I believe that fake 'new messages' bar could be a problem (see here). I suggest you remove it, or change it a bit so that it is different from the actual message bar. Some people do get irritated when they see something like that. Chamal 04:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- When I first fell for this fake message trick, I laughed, I guess some people are easily annoyed. Thanks for the suggestion, I appreciate the sentiment, but the world will be a sad place if all jokes are removed because someone might get irritated. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 17:14, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- True. I don't have a problem with that, just thought I'd let you know. Cheers and happy editing :) Chamal 00:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment
I invite no action or comment, please; but I wonder if it might be worthwhile for you to examine what I have posted as a "comment" at User talk:Tznkai#Note on the topic bans (Caspain Blue and Sennen goroshi)? Plausibly useful? --Tenmei (talk) 22:33, 31 January 2009 (UTC)