Misplaced Pages

Mens rea: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:30, 27 January 2004 editMikeCapone (talk | contribs)1,008 edits added definition of MENS REA, removed useless paragraph and redundant links← Previous edit Revision as of 03:31, 27 January 2004 edit undoDysprosia (talk | contribs)28,388 editsm british punctuationNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''mens rea''' is the "guilty intention" or, literally, the "guilty mind." Without a solid enough proof of this state of mind, it is impossible, at least within the ] system, to convict a person of the crimes which require it. The '''mens rea''' is the "guilty intention" or, literally, the "guilty mind". Without a solid enough proof of this state of mind, it is impossible, at least within the ] system, to convict a person of the crimes which require it.


The best illustration of what the mens rea is the difference between hurting someone voluntarily and accidentally; in the first case, the mens rea, the intention to hurt, is present but not in the second one. The best illustration of what the mens rea is the difference between hurting someone voluntarily and accidentally; in the first case, the mens rea, the intention to hurt, is present but not in the second one.

Revision as of 03:31, 27 January 2004

The mens rea is the "guilty intention" or, literally, the "guilty mind". Without a solid enough proof of this state of mind, it is impossible, at least within the Common Law system, to convict a person of the crimes which require it.

The best illustration of what the mens rea is the difference between hurting someone voluntarily and accidentally; in the first case, the mens rea, the intention to hurt, is present but not in the second one.

Another example: if the intention to kill or to act in a way that can predictably lead to the death is not proved, one can not be found guilty of the crime of murder because the definition of this crime includes this condition (to be convicted, you need both the mens rea and the Actus reus, also known as the "psychological" and "material" elements); without the Mens Rea for murder, the accusation will usually turn into manslaughter, a different but similar crime that does not require the same mens rea.

Examples of mens rea in statutes

Model Penal Code: A person commits murder if he (1) purposely or knowingly (2) causes the death of a human being.

Common Law: (a) It shall be unlawful for a person to cause the death of a human being with malice aforethought. (b) A violation of this section is murder in the second degree.

See also: animus nocendi, voluntas necandi

See generally: Criminal law