Misplaced Pages

User talk:Colonies Chris: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:25, 14 February 2009 editOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,947 edits Extra! Extra! Read all bout it!← Previous edit Revision as of 02:02, 15 February 2009 edit undoOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,947 edits Extra! Extra! Read all bout it!Next edit →
Line 39: Line 39:
==Extra! Extra! Read all bout it!== ==Extra! Extra! Read all bout it!==
. ] (]) 12:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC) . ] (]) 12:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
* that he may be repressing his anger, which may lead to severe problems down the line. ] (]) 02:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:02, 15 February 2009


Archives


This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 3 sections are present.

Welcome!

Hello Colonies Chris, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  -- GraemeL 22:41, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 23:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Temporary injunction in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking

The following temporary injunction has been passed in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking;

Until this case is decided or otherwise directed by the Arbitration Committee, all editors are instructed not to engage in any program of mass linking or delinking of dates in existing articles, including but not limited to through the use of bots, scripts, tools, or otherwise. This injunction is entered as an interim measure and does not reflect any prejudgment of any aspect of the case.

For the Arbitration Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 11:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Your comments at Workshop

I'm sure you must have seen the analysis I did here. Do let me know if there are any more I may have overlooked. Ohconfucius (talk) 15:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

It may interesting to see what the other side has to say about date linking. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:28, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Extra! Extra! Read all bout it!

Even Rubin and Cole say Tennis expert has lost it. Ohconfucius (talk) 12:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)