User talk:71.114.8.82: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:54, 15 February 2009 editLuk (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators44,791 edits unblock reviewed← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:05, 15 February 2009 edit undo71.114.8.82 (talk) →February 2009: PIGS!Next edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:
	<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ] from editing for 31 hours in accordance with ] as a result of your repeated ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your ''']''' by adding the text <nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock\|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki> . ] ] 13:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)</div><!-- {{uw-block1}} --> <br clear="both">		<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ] from editing for 31 hours in accordance with ] as a result of your repeated ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your ''']''' by adding the text <nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock\|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki> . ] ] 13:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)</div><!-- {{uw-block1}} --> <br clear="both">
	{{unblock reviewed\|You are bias liberals that is all there is to it. I am not, I am politically inert. I placed a very well sourced article suggestion in the talk section in the article on ] and ] and it was instantly deleted within three minutes and then four more times by a vandal ] within a half hour. I warned you well about blocking me without good cause, the results will not be nice. Wikipedians are incorrigible to this, now there is profanity there by a liberal and they blocked me just prior to that editor's rants. Ridiculous! Absurd! (but nothing new).\|I don't think we negotiate with terrorists. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 13:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)}}		{{unblock reviewed\|You are bias liberals that is all there is to it. I am not, I am politically inert. I placed a very well sourced article suggestion in the talk section in the article on ] and ] and it was instantly deleted within three minutes and then four more times by a vandal ] within a half hour. I warned you well about blocking me without good cause, the results will not be nice. Wikipedians are incorrigible to this, now there is profanity there by a liberal and they blocked me just prior to that editor's rants. Ridiculous! Absurd! (but nothing new).\|I don't think we negotiate with terrorists. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 13:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)}}

			{{unblock\|your reason here}}

			Terrorist? That is something that should be applied to you blockers of free speech in talk. And where's my open vote? The real terrorist and tyrants raise their filthy heads. So, I think it is well time for this very drastic action of free speech: FUCK YOU PIGS!

Revision as of 14:05, 15 February 2009

February 2009

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Don and Mike Show has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Misplaced Pages. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Misplaced Pages. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bmyspace\.com (links: http://www.myspace.com/mechagenics, http://www.myspace.com/mechagenicsband).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Misplaced Pages's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:22, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:47, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to use talk pages such as Talk:Barack Obama for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked. Brothejr (talk) 11:30, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2009

This is the only warning you will receive. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:Brothejr. Captain-tucker (talk) 12:12, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for 31 hours in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru 13:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.114.8.82 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are bias liberals that is all there is to it. I am not, I am politically inert. I placed a very well sourced article suggestion in the talk section in the article on Barack Obama and ACORN and it was instantly deleted within three minutes and then four more times by a vandal Brothejr within a half hour. I warned you well about blocking me without good cause, the results will not be nice. Wikipedians are incorrigible to this, now there is profanity there by a liberal and they blocked me just prior to that editor's rants. Ridiculous! Absurd! (but nothing new).

Decline reason:

I don't think we negotiate with terrorists. -- lucasbfr 13:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

71.114.8.82 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Terrorist? That is something that should be applied to you blockers of free speech in talk. And where's my open vote? The real terrorist and tyrants raise their filthy heads. So, I think it is well time for this very drastic action of free speech: FUCK YOU PIGS!

Category:

Requests for unblock

Revision as of 13:54, 15 February 2009 editLuk (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators44,791 edits unblock reviewed← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:05, 15 February 2009 edit undo71.114.8.82 (talk) →February 2009: PIGS!Next edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:
	<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ] from editing for 31 hours in accordance with ] as a result of your repeated ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your ''']''' by adding the text <nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock\|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki> . ] ] 13:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)</div><!-- {{uw-block1}} --> <br clear="both">		<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> ] You have been ] from editing for 31 hours in accordance with ] as a result of your repeated ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your ''']''' by adding the text <nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock\|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki> . ] ] 13:28, 15 February 2009 (UTC)</div><!-- {{uw-block1}} --> <br clear="both">
	{{unblock reviewed\|You are bias liberals that is all there is to it. I am not, I am politically inert. I placed a very well sourced article suggestion in the talk section in the article on ] and ] and it was instantly deleted within three minutes and then four more times by a vandal ] within a half hour. I warned you well about blocking me without good cause, the results will not be nice. Wikipedians are incorrigible to this, now there is profanity there by a liberal and they blocked me just prior to that editor's rants. Ridiculous! Absurd! (but nothing new).\|I don't think we negotiate with terrorists. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 13:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)}}		{{unblock reviewed\|You are bias liberals that is all there is to it. I am not, I am politically inert. I placed a very well sourced article suggestion in the talk section in the article on ] and ] and it was instantly deleted within three minutes and then four more times by a vandal ] within a half hour. I warned you well about blocking me without good cause, the results will not be nice. Wikipedians are incorrigible to this, now there is profanity there by a liberal and they blocked me just prior to that editor's rants. Ridiculous! Absurd! (but nothing new).\|I don't think we negotiate with terrorists. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 13:54, 15 February 2009 (UTC)}}

			{{unblock\|your reason here}}

			Terrorist? That is something that should be applied to you blockers of free speech in talk. And where's my open vote? The real terrorist and tyrants raise their filthy heads. So, I think it is well time for this very drastic action of free speech: FUCK YOU PIGS!