| Revision as of 22:05, 20 June 2004 editKirbyMeister (talk | contribs)317 editsNo edit summary | Revision as of 21:30, 2 November 2005 edit undoJfdwolff (talk | contribs)Administrators81,547 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| This is definatly POV. I'm deleting it until someone can attribute/cite this or otherwize NPOV it. | This is definatly POV. I'm deleting it until someone can attribute/cite this or otherwize NPOV it. | ||
| ==Whale.to== | |||
| {{User|Ombudsman}} is pushing a link to a bizarre site linking SBS to vaccinations. See his talkpage for more information on this. ] | ] 21:30, 2 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:30, 2 November 2005
Possible Status as a Legal and Medical Fad
Because SBS isn't the sole cause of subdural hematomas or retinal hemorrhages, some people have no doubt been falsely accused of SBS. Since this is a highly emotionally charged accusation that currently plays well with jurys, groups have been formed to bring what they see as a more balanced view of these injuries to the legal system.
Because false allegations such as Satanic ritual abuse and the Salem witch trials can sometimes enjoy a brief status as a legal fad, and diagnosis can gain the status of a medical fad, caution must be taken in a legal context to insure the rights of both the accused and the victims of SBS.
This is definatly POV. I'm deleting it until someone can attribute/cite this or otherwize NPOV it.
Whale.to
Ombudsman (talk · contribs) is pushing a link to a bizarre site linking SBS to vaccinations. See his talkpage for more information on this. JFW | T@lk 21:30, 2 November 2005 (UTC)