Misplaced Pages

:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abd/JzG: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:57, 19 February 2009 edit JzG (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers155,082 edits Creating deletion discussion page for User:Abd/JzG. (TW)Next edit →
(No difference)

Revision as of 21:57, 19 February 2009

User:Abd/JzG

The context was apparently Abd being asked to provide evidence for a discussion at ]. That discussion was brief, and my action in topic-banning Jed Rothwell was resoundingly endorsed (to the point that the arbitrators were in some doubt as to why I had even bothered bringing such an obvious action to their notice). Ad seems to want to keep this laundry list of grudges, every one of which has been raised multiple times and in multiple venues, and has failed to gain any traction in any of these venues. Complaints have been closed in several venues, in one case citing WP:DEADHORSE. Eventually, when a user repeats the same assertions time after time and they are consistently rejected, it becomes time for them to stop making such assertions. Right now, Abd is doing the opposite. He's actively citing this userspace essay - from which he removed my comments, in violation of WP:OWN, and asserting once again as if they were fact, all the same rejected arguments. Endless repetition of repeatedly rejected complaints is not a valid use of Misplaced Pages user space. Guy (Help!) 21:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)