| Revision as of 09:16, 24 February 2009 editDiamonddannyboy (talk | contribs)1,027 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:14, 28 February 2009 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,224 edits →Edit warring at Talk:Darren M. Jackson: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Please do not revert when I haved blanked the page thank you.--] (]) 10:18, 26 May 2008 (UTC) | Please do not revert when I haved blanked the page thank you.--] (]) 10:18, 26 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
| {{archive box | ] }} | {{archive box | ] }} | ||
| == Edit warring at ] == | |||
| Hello Diamonddannyboy. Revert-warring on Talk pages is lame. If the real issue for you is that there is a disagreement about what should go in the article, there could be ways to get more people to participate in the discussion. If you want outsiders to help out, then removing your own comments seems unlikely to be a good way of getting them to support your views. I also request that you stop editing the Talk page with your IP account, because it's getting close to being a violation of ]. | |||
| If you once again from the Talk page, without having consensus to do so, you may be blocked. Archiving an article Talk page requires consensus. ] (]) 15:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:14, 28 February 2009
I blanked the page as I do on a regular basis, unless there is any important info then I may wish to archive it, please rememeber that it is my talk page and is not against any wikipedia rules when I blank the page.
Please do not revert when I haved blanked the page thank you.--Diamonddannyboy (talk) 10:18, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 Archives |
Archive 1 |
Edit warring at Talk:Darren M. Jackson
Hello Diamonddannyboy. Revert-warring on Talk pages is lame. If the real issue for you is that there is a disagreement about what should go in the article, there could be ways to get more people to participate in the discussion. If you want outsiders to help out, then removing your own comments seems unlikely to be a good way of getting them to support your views. I also request that you stop editing the Talk page with your IP account, because it's getting close to being a violation of WP:SOCK.
If you once again remove others' comments from the Talk page, without having consensus to do so, you may be blocked. Archiving an article Talk page requires consensus. EdJohnston (talk) 15:14, 28 February 2009 (UTC)