Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:42, 6 March 2009

This is Atlantabravz's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 7 days

Thanks to Avruch for installing an archive bot on my talkpage

Vandalism Templates

Check out the following articles:

• Misplaced Pages:Vandalism - Includes templates for user pages.
• Misplaced Pages:Warning_templates
• Misplaced Pages:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism
• Template:Uw-vandalism1
• Template:Uw-vandalism2
• Template:Uw-vandalism3
• Template:uw-vandalism4im

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Archibaldsinclair.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Archibaldsinclair.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Archibaldsinclair.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Archibaldsinclair.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Notable SEAL

Stop Removing Charles Hoelzel As a Notable SEAL He is a Navy Cross Recipient and has earned the right to be considered a Notable SEAL, He also is enshrined at the UDT/SEAL museum. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nec532x (talk • contribs) 19:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

The-Expose-in-ator Replies

I have nothing against the Biden family except he was a Draft Dodger that let some other less eligible, less qualified and probably less educated individual go to Vietnam in his place. He did everything short of maiming himself to dodge the draft and, if he hadn't been able to get a letter from his family physician "discovering" a disqualifying "illness" and made a big enough issue of it to get his induction cancelled, he might have tried maiming but I doubt he had the guts. As a draftee from Scranton, PA, I have a little experience with how the draft worked and how physicals were conducted. Joe would have had to have made quite a stink to beat it. I took Joe's place in Vietnam and ended up serving an extended tour to make up for him not going!

As for Beau, the entry on his page is INCORRECT but I notice you did not comment about that. Here is the truth: Beau Biden's unit did not arrive in Iraq in Nov 08, they arrive on 22 Dec 08, according to the Delaware National Guard official website (http://www.delawarenationalguard.com/home/new/content/dngnews/2008/Dec/261st/2008decDJvolume2.pdf ). He did come back TDY on 13 Jan 09, 22 days later according to Lt. Col. Len Gratteri, a Delaware Army National Guard spokesman. He said "CPT Beau Biden began a temporary assignment at the Pentagon on Thursday,15 Jan. Details about the assignment or how long it will last weren't immediately available" (http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iSHFhLebRKfuSV_xdz1v...cY2sQD9 ). Without Dad's help, he (and any other soldier) would not have been eligible for leave until midpoint of his tour. In Vietnam when someone had only been in Country 22 days we used to say he was "still pissing Stateside water!"

Regardless, he did NOT come back on leave, he returned TDY which meant he flew back on "duty status" so had priority and bumped a soldier returning on R&R who would have been in-country between 6 and 7 months. Nice move Beau! —Preceding unsigned comment added by The-Expose-inator (talk • contribs) 04:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Notable SEAL

I know Charles Hoelzel personally, he and I graduated from BUD/S class 117 together, that article you refer too from the USA Today was wrong, the reporter never interviewed Chuck face to face he only interviewed John Andretti, My name is Bob McMeans and Chuck and I served together with ST2,ST6 then onto DEVGRU. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nec532x (talk • contribs) 19:32, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

You are a complete idiot, you are trying to ruin the reputation of a man who served his country faithfully for over 20 years, it is apparent that that THE AUTHENTICATOR IS WRONG, Charles graduated with me you peanut headed ass, and class 117 did graduate in September of 82, it is apparent you believe everything you read, That article which was written on him was not only quoted as he said this or that, he did not, as a matter of fact do some fact checking, he sued the paper for misrepresentation, because he refused to speak with them on any subject, so they spoke with Jon Andretti who said a load of bullshit. The sad part is Chuck does not no anything about any of your antics or even being on Misplaced Pages and now you because of you he is on a phonies board. That is disgraceful and so are you. Get your facts right, you fucking idiot.

Bob McMeans