Misplaced Pages

User talk:Pepperbeast: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:55, 1 March 2009 editLessHeard vanU (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users33,613 edits March 2009: unblock notice and unreserved apologies← Previous edit Revision as of 00:31, 8 March 2009 edit undoMr.Z-bot (talk | contribs)89,315 editsm Removing Temporary userpage categoryNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:
== March 2009 == == March 2009 ==


<div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''blocked indefinitely''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{#if:|'''{{{reason}}}'''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below. {{#if:|] (]) 12:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 -->] Spamming and vandalism. ] (]) 12:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC) <div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''blocked indefinitely''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{#if:|'''{{{reason}}}'''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below. {{#if:|] (]) 12:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 --> Spamming and vandalism. ] (]) 12:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


{{tlx|unblock|reason}} {{tlx|unblock|reason}}

Revision as of 00:31, 8 March 2009

Welcome!

Hello, Pepperbeast, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Chris 23:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


Mince meat article

Hi Beastiepaws. I am for ridding wikipedia of urban myth and old wives tales but the The Cambridge World History of Food discusses the use of clove and cinnamon bark in at least two places, one about mince meat, being used to mask off flavors. CApitol3 (talk) 13:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi again Beastiepaws. Perhaps the "World History of Food" is wrong. I see the Scully endnote. I'm at owrk not a home now. I'll revert my undo, and recheck tonight. CApitol3 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 14:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Coriander

Please do not categorize my edits as vandalism, as you did in your edit summary for Coriander. It is well known that people who taste soap while eating cilantro are genetically defective, and my edits were in good faith. riffic (talk) 01:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Your edit was, at best, unconstructive. The article on coriander states there is no established genetic basis for differences in perception of coriander and provides references to back up the claim. Even it it *were* genetically based, that wouldn't make people who perceive a particular flavour "defective". Genetic variations are not not necessarily defects. They're just variations. Beastiepaws (talk) 02:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

March 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

Spamming and vandalism. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

{{unblock|reason}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Absolutely my mistake, I blocked the wrong party. Totally my error, for which I apologise. I have, prior to this message, unblocked the account (and removed the autoblocks I could find) with a note that the block was totally my fault. I hope that you have not been inconvenienced too much, and can only once again say that I am truly sorry for the error. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Request handled by: LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

I have contacted the blocking admin. --Anthony.bradbury 19:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Beastiepaws (talk) 21:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)