Misplaced Pages

User talk:62.189.161.120: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:31, 9 March 2009 edit62.189.161.120 (talk) →4th block for same thing← Previous edit Revision as of 11:35, 9 March 2009 edit undoKS3 Maffs (talk | contribs)50 edits →4th block for same thing: NONext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
{{unblock reviewed|1=I didn't realise how seriously things would be taken. I have some useful contributions to be made as well and promise not to touch Bravestar|decline=Given the long history of disruptive edits coming from this ip, a long block seems appropriate. ]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 13:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)}} {{unblock reviewed|1=I didn't realise how seriously things would be taken. I have some useful contributions to be made as well and promise not to touch Bravestar|decline=Given the long history of disruptive edits coming from this ip, a long block seems appropriate. ]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 13:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|1=Well that makes me sick. Look at the article at ] and think how much I could improve it|decline=That's exactly right. How much you ''could'' have improved it had you not vandalized. ]]] 15:08, 6 March 2009 (UTC)}} {{unblock reviewed|1=Well that makes me sick. Look at the article at ] and think how much I could improve it|decline=That's exactly right. How much you ''could'' have improved it had you not vandalized. ]]] 15:08, 6 March 2009 (UTC)}}
{{unblock|Again I ask you to rethink this. I can easily improve that article but you are not letting me because of, what, 10 very similar edits? It is hard to imagine this block is really here to protect the encyclopedia but more because of some kind of vengence/punishment. I have read WP:BLOCK and that is not what blocks should be about, allegedly!}} {{unblock reviewed|1=Again I ask you to rethink this. I can easily improve that article but you are not letting me because of, what, 10 very similar edits? It is hard to imagine this block is really here to protect the encyclopedia but more because of some kind of vengence/punishment. I have read WP:BLOCK and that is not what blocks should be about, allegedly!|decline=Eyes of the hawk, strength of the bear, speed of the puma, block log of the troll. ] (]) 11:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 11:35, 9 March 2009

Shared IP addressWelcome!Last edited:
Last edited by:11:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
KS3 Maffs (talk · contribs)

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account!

Your IP address, 62.189.161.120, is registered to TRX Futures Limited and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

February 2009

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to BraveStarr, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. CrispMuncher (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2009 (UTC).

To edit, please log in.Last edited:
Last edited by:11:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
KS3 Maffs (talk · contribs)

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Kralizec! (talk) 17:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Comments: block duration: two weeks

4th block for same thing

You have been blocked from editing Misplaced Pages for a period of 3 months as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie 16:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.189.161.120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have learnt my lesson. Reduce block to one week and I won't vandalise again

Decline reason:

I find this very unlikely, considering the two previous blocks obviously had zero impact whatsoever. Hersfold 18:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.189.161.120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't realise how seriously things would be taken. I have some useful contributions to be made as well and promise not to touch Bravestar

Decline reason:

Given the long history of disruptive edits coming from this ip, a long block seems appropriate. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.189.161.120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well that makes me sick. Look at the article at Chi-X and think how much I could improve it

Decline reason:

That's exactly right. How much you could have improved it had you not vandalized. J.delanoyadds 15:08, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.189.161.120 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Again I ask you to rethink this. I can easily improve that article but you are not letting me because of, what, 10 very similar edits? It is hard to imagine this block is really here to protect the encyclopedia but more because of some kind of vengence/punishment. I have read WP:BLOCK and that is not what blocks should be about, allegedly!

Decline reason:

Eyes of the hawk, strength of the bear, speed of the puma, block log of the troll. KS3 Maffs (talk) 11:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.