Misplaced Pages

:Requests for mediation/Joan of Arc: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:47, 6 November 2005 editRedwolf24 (talk | contribs)11,598 edits templated  Revision as of 23:32, 7 November 2005 edit undoHighest-Authority-on-Joan-of-Arc-Related-Scholarship (talk | contribs)163 editsm []: his -> herNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
::This anonymous user has admitted he '''is''' ] by responding at the above assumption made by ] (about him being possibly banned), at the history of ], thusly: ::This anonymous user has admitted he '''is''' ] by responding at the above assumption made by ] (about him being possibly banned), at the history of ], thusly:
:::3 November 2005 64.12.116.197 (Edit comment: I'll drop the main point of dispute, but certain basic things nevertheless need to be cleaned up. ('''I have never been "banned", by the way''')) :::3 November 2005 64.12.116.197 (Edit comment: I'll drop the main point of dispute, but certain basic things nevertheless need to be cleaned up. ('''I have never been "banned", by the way'''))
::... meaning 64.12.116.197 '''is''' ]. The fact that he (indeed) was never banned is not important. More important is that he admits editing in disguise. Not very Wikipedian-like. And further: I support ] in his efforts to improve the ] article. &#8212; ] 00:02, 4 November 2005 (UTC) ::... meaning 64.12.116.197 '''is''' ]. The fact that he (indeed) was never banned is not important. More important is that he admits editing in disguise. Not very Wikipedian-like. And further: I support ] in her efforts to improve the ] article. &#8212; ] 00:02, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
:::I'll have ] take this case. ]]] (]) 22:47, 5 November 2005 (UTC) :::I'll have ] take this case. ]]] (]) 22:47, 5 November 2005 (UTC)



Revision as of 23:32, 7 November 2005

Joan of Arc

There is an edit war at the Joan of Arc page. I'm new but it seems to be an old problem. User Jhballard is manufacturing fictitious reference sources. Refer to his revision 04:24, 30 October 2005, footnote 1 and his corresponding history note. I've attempted to engage him in dialogue. It's gotten very strange. His latest discussion entry suggests Joan of Arc had hallucinogenic drugs spliced into her DNA.

Noticed the above as I was about to post. The article is flagged for revision. Jhballard appears more confused than hostile. I'm going ahead with the post I've prepared then waiting for your action. Thank you, and please advise. Durova 07:40, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Jhballard and an anonymous user (possibly a banned user named Allen?) are conducting aggressive edits and critiquing through the history notes. I've attempted to return discussion to the discussion page. Another user urged me to continue dialogue. I am not changing their edits although their scholarship is lacking. Please advise. Durova 21:31, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
This anonymous user has admitted he is Allen Williamson by responding at the above assumption made by Durova (about him being possibly banned), at the history of Joan of Arc, thusly:
3 November 2005 64.12.116.197 (Edit comment: I'll drop the main point of dispute, but certain basic things nevertheless need to be cleaned up. (I have never been "banned", by the way))
... meaning 64.12.116.197 is Allen Williamson. The fact that he (indeed) was never banned is not important. More important is that he admits editing in disguise. Not very Wikipedian-like. And further: I support Durova in her efforts to improve the Joan of Arc article. — HAJARS 00:02, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
I'll have Stevertigo take this case. Redwolf24 (talk) 22:47, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Although Durova's comments above are not direct with specific text to mediate, we can proceed if Durova agrees to refrain from such personal gestures and implications like "strange," "confused," "hostile," "scholarship is lacking," "conducting agressive edits," and etc. ---- Mr. Ballard 01:39, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Ill take it - parties can agree to mediation or not. Start tomorrow. -St|eve 08:43, 6 November 2005 (UTC) PS: left note at talk:joan of arc. Listed as Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Joan of Arc -SV