Revision as of 16:58, 15 March 2009 view sourceThehelpfulbot (talk | contribs)56,901 editsm WikiProject Newsletter← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:58, 16 March 2009 view source Montanabw (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers105,492 edits →Rodeo - possible trouble: MoreNext edit → | ||
Line 368: | Line 368: | ||
::::You're the one in a bunch over this. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 12:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | ::::You're the one in a bunch over this. <span style="font-family:Verdana,sans-serif"> — ] • ] • </span> 12:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::: You didn't answer my question. Since when do WP articles have "lead editors"? ] (]) 13:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | ::::: You didn't answer my question. Since when do WP articles have "lead editors"? ] (]) 13:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::::FYI, I see Buttermilk has now started ], which is just "asking the other parent." This is not going to improve the situation. Among other things, I reviewed some of the sources and you are quoting them word for word without attribution, which is a copyvio. ]<sup>]</sup> 07:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
== ] Newsletter == | == ] Newsletter == | ||
Revision as of 07:58, 16 March 2009
——————————————— MY TALK PAGE ———————————————
Home | Talk | About me | Awards | Articles | Contributions | Images | Notebook | Sandbox | Todo | Toolbox |
re: happy your day
Hi, Rlevse. That's very kind of you. Thanks very much! --Rrburke 14:50, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much! :) iMatthew // talk // 00:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'd also like to thank you, rather belatedly. Studying two exams over contemporary ethics and the history of the criminal justice system of the roman empire takes quite a bit out of a person. -MBK004 06:48, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- YOu're all welcome and deserving. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Good work
I'd just like to state how I think you're doing the user base a fine service with your "Wikipedian of the day" messages. Spreading goodwill is something that should really be encouraged here on Misplaced Pages; the work can sometimes be thankless and stressful and what you've been doing lightens the mood a bit. Great job. —Anonymous Dissident 06:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 11:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
WikiCup Newsletter
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- 18:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 18:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Signpost — 2 March 2009
This week, the Misplaced Pages Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
- Books extension enabled
- News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
- Misplaced Pages in the news: Misplaced Pages's role in journalism, Smarter Misplaced Pages, Skittles
- Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Ping!
You got mail. →Dyl@n620 02:24, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Way ahead of you. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:29, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Ireland naming question
You are receiving this message because you have previously posted at a Ireland naming related discussion. Per Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names#Back-up procedure, a procedure has been developed at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration, and the project is now taking statements. Before creating or replying to a statement please consider the statement process, the problems and current statements. GnevinAWB (talk) 18:18, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
our page-moving friend
If you get a chance, can you look at Special:Contributions/Daerlun and possibly Special:Contributions/VIMEE, and maybe nuke a proxy or two? Cheers! J.delanoyadds 22:17, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Iberian-Guanche inscriptions
Users and administrators were treated as referees for a paper.Editing (by me at least) was continiously dome.ADedletion Discussion (balanced) was closed together with the page by Fritzpoll and an altogether more complete and edited page "Iberian-Canarian" inscriptions was deleted straight away by Kwamikagani,who sent page to Arbitration Comitee.ation —Preceding unsigned comment added by Virginal6 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- You should file your statement at the case at WP:RFAR — Rlevse • Talk • 02:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Recall initiated against MBisanz
Brrryce (talk · contribs) has instigated an administrator recall request against MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), alleging that his deletion of African Americans in Davenport, Iowa (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore) constituted an abuse of his admin tools. I have been asked to clerk this process, and am posting this notice here pursuant to MBisanz's recall policy. This policy stipulates that if five administrators meeting specified criteria endorse the recall request within 48 hours, MBisanz will either resign adminship or initiate a reconfirmation RFA. As I am posting this notice at a number of locations, I would suggest that all discussion be centralized at User talk:MBisanz/Recall. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 19:22, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: AF Astronauts
I'll get to work on that within 48 hours. You'll notice that I already took care of USMA. Also, thanks for the reminders. -MBK004 19:43, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Rockin. Thanks for the tidbit. JKBrooks85 (talk) 04:36, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Conversion complete, I'll reference them tomorrow. -MBK004 06:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- And my work is done. -MBK004 21:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wow, thanks. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:40, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- And my work is done. -MBK004 21:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Conversion complete, I'll reference them tomorrow. -MBK004 06:37, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Happy Rlevse's Day!
Rlevse has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, |
- Wow, thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 01:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Harrison
Congrats! –Juliancolton 04:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Cool, Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 12:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Cheers!
The Indiana Barnstar | ||
For all your work on bringing William Henry Harrison, a very important article to WikiProject Indiana, through a FAC, I hearby award you, Rlevse, the Indiana Barnstar. Thanks for all you do here. Congratulations! |
Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 14:55, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
For you
The WikiChevrons | ||
In recognition of your contributions to two MILHIST Featured Articles and two Featured Lists (with more on the way), it is my pleasure to present you with these WikiChevrons. Keep up the good work! -MBK004 00:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC) |
WOW THANKS! — Rlevse • Talk • 00:51, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Signpost — 9 March 2009
This week, the Misplaced Pages Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
- News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
- Misplaced Pages in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
- Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 00:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
dfrench blocked
I am not using someone else's name, I am using my user name dfrench.
Dana French —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dfrench (talk • contribs) 20:46, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Dana L. French article
Apparently the user "Tedickey", who I am having an editing war with, has removed the article "Dana L. French", can you restore this article please.
Please see the User:Tedickey#Dana_L._French discussion. He apparently does not read the articles before he applies edits.
Dana French —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dfrench (talk • contribs) 20:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Comments on Tedicky's page. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I have responded to User:Tedickey#Dana_L._French and the lie he is asserting on his talk page, in case you are interested. Dfrench (talk) 20:20, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: cats
My pleasure. If you're interested, HotCat is extremely simple to use and although I don't use it as much as I do Twinkle and Friendly, I consider it an invaluable piece of my toolbox. -MBK004 01:58, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
Hello, Rlevse. You have new messages at MBK004's talk page.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
I've went ahead and placed the template on the Academy page, alumni, Astronauts, CNOs, and Legislators. The see also can be trimmed. -MBK004 00:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks...
Thanks a lot for this, Rlevse. That was completely unexpected. Err... are you sure it wasn't meant for somebody else? :P Chamal 11:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- It was for you. — Rlevse • Talk • 16:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Orion_P._Howe
Doing... –Juliancolton 04:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's what I was thinking, as well. It's probably best for the article to report on the conflicting records as it is now. –Juliancolton 04:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- This has a very interesting quote about Howe, though I'm not sure if it's copyrighted. Thoughts? –Juliancolton 04:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- That also says he didn't graduate USNA and disappeared, but we know he went to dental school and moved to MO. I think several of the sources find the original Sherman book and use it as a base and don't do further research, leading to all this partial info. That quote would be from the Civil War, I don't see how it could be copyrighted. Also, I've seen several parts of that passage in other refs. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- This says the same thing, oddly. Of course, if the USNA itself says he graduated, I don't see how it could by otherwise.
- The new info looks good, by the way. I added a bit of that quote last night after further research. –Juliancolton 14:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- That also says he didn't graduate USNA and disappeared, but we know he went to dental school and moved to MO. I think several of the sources find the original Sherman book and use it as a base and don't do further research, leading to all this partial info. That quote would be from the Civil War, I don't see how it could be copyrighted. Also, I've seen several parts of that passage in other refs. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
My day
Thank you! :) NawlinWiki (talk) 19:56, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Re:Legislators
I don`t see anything wrong with it, why? --Scorpion 22:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Try reading the FLC instructions which say "each nomination will last at least 10 days". Anyway what's the hurry. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 22:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- I assume you're talking about this one. It's only been open 9 days. The minimum is ten. -- Scorpion 22:26, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- Patience, dude :). The next promotion is usually Tuesday evening (North American time). Dabomb87 (talk) 23:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
←See my response on my talk page in case you missed it. -MBK004 03:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Smile!
Xclamation point has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! You do great work managing your crat work, your arbcom work, your article work. Nice job!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
- Wow Thanks! — Rlevse • Talk • 11:47, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Rodeo - possible trouble
Hi Rlevse, I took a five day wikibreak. Bad idea. Sigh. The rodeo article got hit, bad, by an animal rights editor. I reverted it to the last clean version and made a good faith attempt to add in some of the material that was actually kind of useful and interesting, but the last time this happened, Dreadstar wound up blocking a user who got way too emotional. This article will need watchlisting for a while and neutral, cool heads to stay involved. I shall let you decide who to task with the job, but a cool head is needed. Thanks. Montanabw 05:49, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Buttermilk's unexplained deletions and not using the talk page are not good. I restored a full version and warned him/her. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:51, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- I spent 5 days improving the article only to have it DESTROYED by someone on a Wikibreak. *sigh* you can't win around here. The place belongs to a few. Montana has used my sources inappropriately to validate her OR abd I reverted the article to the version that I found when I approached in the first place. The article is in poor hands under Monatanbw and needs the work of a skilled editor. The work I did had the approval of the only other editor who appeared to be interested. The article as it stands is not fit to wrap garbage in. The article truly needs a skilled editor and Montana simply is not the one to do it. Buttermilk1950 (talk) 12:19, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Don't get your knickers in a bunch over this. I don't want anything to do with the article. It's a mess and as long as Montanabw is "sitting" on it, it will never improve. (She wrote somewhere she was the "lead editor". Since when do Wiki articles have "lead editors"?) Ta! Buttermilk1950 (talk) 12:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- You're the one in a bunch over this. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- You didn't answer my question. Since when do WP articles have "lead editors"? Buttermilk1950 (talk) 13:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- FYI, I see Buttermilk has now started Rodeo in the United States, which is just "asking the other parent." This is not going to improve the situation. Among other things, I reviewed some of the sources and you are quoting them word for word without attribution, which is a copyvio. Montanabw 07:58, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- You didn't answer my question. Since when do WP articles have "lead editors"? Buttermilk1950 (talk) 13:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- You're the one in a bunch over this. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:35, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- Don't get your knickers in a bunch over this. I don't want anything to do with the article. It's a mess and as long as Montanabw is "sitting" on it, it will never improve. (She wrote somewhere she was the "lead editor". Since when do Wiki articles have "lead editors"?) Ta! Buttermilk1950 (talk) 12:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- I spent 5 days improving the article only to have it DESTROYED by someone on a Wikibreak. *sigh* you can't win around here. The place belongs to a few. Montana has used my sources inappropriately to validate her OR abd I reverted the article to the version that I found when I approached in the first place. The article is in poor hands under Monatanbw and needs the work of a skilled editor. The work I did had the approval of the only other editor who appeared to be interested. The article as it stands is not fit to wrap garbage in. The article truly needs a skilled editor and Montana simply is not the one to do it. Buttermilk1950 (talk) 12:19, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
WikiCup Newsletter
The WikiCup Newsletter | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- 16:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC) The Helpful Bot 16:58, 15 March 2009 (UTC)