Misplaced Pages

User talk:Stevvvv4444: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:29, 16 March 2009 editCordless Larry (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators56,589 edits Categorisation: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 22:34, 16 March 2009 edit undoJohn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers215,520 edits Categorisation: ctNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:


I notice that you're categorising people by ethnicity in breach of ] again. Please stop. ] (]) 22:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC) I notice that you're categorising people by ethnicity in breach of ] again. Please stop. ] (]) 22:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
:I've reverted these recent additions. Please do not restore them or perform any further edits of this sort. As you have already been advised, categorizing people in this way breaches our policies. Thanks. --] (]) 22:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:34, 16 March 2009

Featured article review

I have nominated British African-Caribbean community for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:45, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Categorisation

I notice that you're categorising people by ethnicity in breach of WP:OC#CATGRS again. Please stop. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I've reverted these recent additions. Please do not restore them or perform any further edits of this sort. As you have already been advised, categorizing people in this way breaches our policies. Thanks. --John (talk) 22:34, 16 March 2009 (UTC)