| Revision as of 03:15, 17 March 2009 editKs64q2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,047 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:21, 17 March 2009 edit undoKs64q2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,047 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| Considering that article is two days into AfD, and that I have already notified an administrator, I suggest we both recuse ourselves from editing ] lest any accusations of acting in ill-faith come up. Though you've still neglected to enlighten me on your reasoning behind your original line of thinking, and why ] doesn't seem to need to apply. ] (]) 03:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC) | Considering that article is two days into AfD, and that I have already notified an administrator, I suggest we both recuse ourselves from editing ] lest any accusations of acting in ill-faith come up. Though you've still neglected to enlighten me on your reasoning behind your original line of thinking, and why ] doesn't seem to need to apply. ] (]) 03:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ***] Please stop inserting ] notices from pages that you have a conflict of interest with {{#if:|, as you did with ] |
***] Please stop inserting ] notices from pages that you have a conflict of interest with {{#if:|, as you did with ]. This article was removed from Speedy Deletion by another user, and you simply cannot replace it because you feel it appropriate, considering the AfD discussion is already well underway and current consensus leans '''Keep'''. If you continue, you will be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-speedy3 -->-- ] (]) 03:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:21, 17 March 2009
 Archives |
New discussions go at the bottom
The Motley Moose
Good evening, sir! I caught your comment in the AfD discussion for The Motley Moose and wanted to point out your specific points have been addressed. I do sincerely appreciate your input but please review the entire AfD discussion. However, if you do have specific problems with sources, let me know. Thank you for your input! Ks64q2 (talk) 00:18, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Also, sir, I am curious to know under what circumstances that DailyKos isn't a "reliable" source; and how the other sources are still not considered either reliable or valid, given the arguments put forward. Just want to get your input here; obviously, you have a different and unique opinion, especially considered the policies set forward in WP:V, so I was hoping you'd share them with me so I can make the article better. Thank you. Ks64q2 (talk) 02:24, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Sir, I reverted your "speedy deletion" clause once again, for the same reasons I cited originally in the AfD discussion, and have forwarded your actions to an administrator. Thank you for your understanding. Ks64q2 (talk) 03:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Absolutely, please note the comments of user "Fram" in the AfD discussion, he is the administrator currently involved with the thread. Ks64q2 (talk) 03:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Considering that article is two days into AfD, and that I have already notified an administrator, I suggest we both recuse ourselves from editing The Motley Moose lest any accusations of acting in ill-faith come up. Though you've still neglected to enlighten me on your reasoning behind your original line of thinking, and why WP:V doesn't seem to need to apply. Ks64q2 (talk) 03:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Please stop inserting speedy deletion notices from pages that you have a conflict of interest with {{#if:|, as you did with The Motley Moose. This article was removed from Speedy Deletion by another user, and you simply cannot replace it because you feel it appropriate, considering the AfD discussion is already well underway and current consensus leans Keep. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. -- Ks64q2 (talk) 03:15, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
