Misplaced Pages

Jagdish Tytler: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:35, 7 April 2009 edit116.22.145.82 (talk) Clean chit by CBI in 2009← Previous edit Revision as of 13:07, 7 April 2009 edit undo69.203.84.79 (talk) Clean chit by CBI in 2009Next edit →
Line 67: Line 67:
In March 2009, when the CBI filed its final report on investigation into the riots case involving Jagdish Tytler, the ] spokesman Prakash Javadekar alleged that the "such a clean chit ahead of the elections" implied CBI has been misused.<ref name="pti_march_2009">. Press Trust of India.</ref> Hundreds of Sikh protestors gathered outside the Karkardooma courts and raised slogans against Tytler and other senior leaders allegedly involved in the riots.<ref name="pti_march_2009"/> In March 2009, when the CBI filed its final report on investigation into the riots case involving Jagdish Tytler, the ] spokesman Prakash Javadekar alleged that the "such a clean chit ahead of the elections" implied CBI has been misused.<ref name="pti_march_2009">. Press Trust of India.</ref> Hundreds of Sikh protestors gathered outside the Karkardooma courts and raised slogans against Tytler and other senior leaders allegedly involved in the riots.<ref name="pti_march_2009"/>


On 7 April 2009, India's home minister ] was ] by Jarnail Singh, a ] journalist who works at the ] daily ] on the issue of clean chit to Jagdish Tytler. And he even left with out any case field against him , ahead of elections <ref></ref> On 7 April 2009, India's home minister ] was ] by Jarnail Singh, a ] journalist who works at the ] daily ] on the issue of clean chit to Jagdish Tytler. The home minister ordered security to "please take him away." <ref></ref>


==Debate With HS Phoolka== ==Debate With HS Phoolka==

Revision as of 13:07, 7 April 2009

The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (March 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Jagdish Tytler
MP
ConstituencyDelhi Sadar
Personal details
Born (1944-01-11) 11 January 1944 (age 80)
New Delhi
Political partyINC
ResidenceNew Delhi
As of September 16, 2006Source:

Jagdish Tytler (b. January 11, 1944) is a controversial Indian politician, several times a Union Minister, he belongs to the ruling Indian National Congress party. He was the Indian Union Minister of State for Overseas Indian Affairs, a position he resigned from after an official commission of inquiry noted the 'balance of probability' indicated he was responsible for inciting and leading murderous mobs against the Sikh community in Delhi during the 1984 Anti-Sikh Riots, a charge he denies.

Early days

File:Jagdishtytlerwedding2.jpg
Jagdish Tytler's marriage
File:Jagdishtytlerwedding1.jpg
Jagdish Tytler's marriage

Tytler was born in Gujranwala (now in Pakistan), in a Kapoor family. He was born to a Hindu father who died when he was a child and to a Sikh mother, Dayal Kaur who raised him alone under the Sikh traditions.

He was brought up by the eminent educationist, James Douglas Tytler, who was the founder of many public schools including the Delhi Public School and the Summer Fields School.

He was converted to Christianity by Mr James Douglas Tytler and he took his name.

Active in the Congress' youth organisation and a disciple of Sanjay Gandhi, he was first elected to the Lok Sabha in 1980. He served as a Union Minister first in the Civil Aviation department and then in the Labor department. He was re-elected in 1991 and served as the Union Minister of State for Surface Transport. In 2004, he was re-elected to the Lok Sabha.

1984 anti-Sikh riots case

The official report of the Nanavati Commission of Government of India on the 1984 Anti-Sikh riots found some 'credible evidence' against Tytler, saying he 'very probably' had a hand in organising the attacks. The Indian government, however, decided not to prosecute Jagdish Tytler due to lack of sufficient concrete evidence.

Tytler claimed innocence and said that the evidence was a case of mistaken identity. Tytler had not been named by eight earlier inquiry commissions setup to investigate the 1984 anti-Sikh riots. On August 10, 2005, his resignation from the Union Council of Ministers was accepted by the President of India on the recommendation of Prime Minister of India, Manmohan Singh.

On April, 2004 the Indian National Congress Party announced Sajjan Kumar, Jagdish Tytler, R.K. Anand and others allegedly involved in the anti-Sikh riots, as its candidates for Indian Parliament elections for constituencies in and around Delhi. These members of parliament were accused by several independent commissions of inquiry of being complicit in the riots, including the People's Union for Civil Liberties, the People's Union for Democratic Rights and the Citizen's Justice Committee.

The G.T. Nanavati Commission, which is now looking into the riots, continues to receive affidavits from victims with details of the activities of Sajjan, Anand and Tytler. Tytler became minister of state with independent charge of non-resident affairs, a post which he relinquished under duress, following the Nanavati Commission's report.

Reopening of the case in 2007

India's Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) closed all cases against Jagdish Tytler in November 2007 for his alleged criminal conspiracy to engineer riots against Sikhs in the aftermath of Indira Gandhi’s assassination on October 31, 1984. CBI submitted a report to the Delhi court which stated that no evidence or witness was found to corroborate the allegations against Tytler of leading murderous mobs during 1984 . It was also alleged in the court that then member of the Indian Parliament Jagdish Tytler was complaining to his supporters about relatively "small" number of sikhs killed in his parliamentary constituency Delhi Sadar, which in his opinion had undermined his position in the ruling Indian National Congress party of India .

However in December 2007, a witness Jasbir Singh, who is lives in California, appeared on several private television news channels in India, and stated that he was never contacted by Central Bureau of Investigation. India's main opposition party Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) demanded an explanation from the minister in-charge of CBI in Indian Parliament. However, Minister of State for Personnel Suresh Pachouri, who is in-charge of department of CBI, and was present in the parliament session refused to make a statement.

On December 18 2007, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate of Delhi court Mr. Sanjeev Jain, who had earlier dismissed the case after CBI submitted a misleading report in his court; ordered India's Central Bureau of Investigation to reopen cases relating to 1984 Anti-Sikh riots against Jagdish Tytler.

December 2008

In December 2008, a two member CBI team was sent to New York to record the statements of two eyewitnesses, Jasbir Singh and Surinder Singh. The two witnesses have stated that they saw Jagdish Tytler lead a mob during the riots, but did not want to come to India as they feared for their security.

Clean chit by CBI in 2009

After rigorous investigation and recording of testimony in Indian consulates in New York and San Francisco, the CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation), in a ground breaking conclusion, determines that the two witnesses examined by its team in the United States in connection with the 1984 anti-Sikh riots were not credible enough and failed to give any proof linking former Union Minister Jagdish Tytler to the rioters.

In March 2009, when the CBI filed its final report on investigation into the riots case involving Jagdish Tytler, the BJP spokesman Prakash Javadekar alleged that the "such a clean chit ahead of the elections" implied CBI has been misused. Hundreds of Sikh protestors gathered outside the Karkardooma courts and raised slogans against Tytler and other senior leaders allegedly involved in the riots.

On 7 April 2009, India's home minister P. Chidambaram was shoed by Jarnail Singh, a Sikh journalist who works at the Hindi daily Dainik Jagaran on the issue of clean chit to Jagdish Tytler. The home minister ordered security to "please take him away."

Debate With HS Phoolka

On a TV Debate with H. S. Phoolka (Campaigner for human rights and the Delhi pogrom victims), Jagdish Tytler was over heard making verbal threats off camera, when challenged about his role in the 1984 Delhi Pogrom.

See also

References

  1. ^ Bio-Data of Shri Jagdish Tytler. Press Information Bureau, Government of India.
  2. Fresh probe into India politician
  3. BJP to govt: Clear stand on anti-Sikh riots' witness
  4. 1984 riots: CBI to re-investigate Tytler's role
  5. Anti Sikh riots witness to give statement to CBI in US
  6. Testimony against Tytler unreliable, says CBI
  7. ^ CBI files final report in anti-Sikh riot case against Tytler. Press Trust of India.
  8. The Times of India
  9. www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8pu18lUh6s - Debate Between Jagdish Tytler and HS Phoolka

External links

Categories: