| Revision as of 04:12, 16 April 2009 view sourceDurova (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,685 edits →I have been blocked for 72 hours without warning.: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:10, 16 April 2009 view source Off2riorob (talk | contribs)80,325 edits →I have been blocked for 72 hours without warning.: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
| so I know my intention and what I have done and I would just ask that I would be treated in an unbiased way. and get a punishment that I actually diserve ,, which is not a three day ban without an official warning .. you know .. one of those red hands .. actually someone asked what else was yellowman supposed to do .. well he could of issued me a final warning ..which probably would have sufficed . (] (]) 03:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)) | so I know my intention and what I have done and I would just ask that I would be treated in an unbiased way. and get a punishment that I actually diserve ,, which is not a three day ban without an official warning .. you know .. one of those red hands .. actually someone asked what else was yellowman supposed to do .. well he could of issued me a final warning ..which probably would have sufficed . (] (]) 03:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)) | ||
| :Rob, please review ]. I had no intention to seek 'revenge'. You happen to have sought me out recently, in a rather memorable way, and it is not unusual to watchlist a user talk after that type of exchange. Today it came up on the watchlist and I saw two posts: one of yours claiming you were blocked without any warning at all, and another by an administrator who was considering unblocking. Actually you had been warned and were misrepresenting that history to a sysop. That created a reason to follow up. If you are willing to be reasonable, shake cyberhands, and seek normal dispute resolution I could ask the administrators to shorten your block to 48 hours. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 04:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | :Rob, please review ]. I had no intention to seek 'revenge'. You happen to have sought me out recently, in a rather memorable way, and it is not unusual to watchlist a user talk after that type of exchange. Today it came up on the watchlist and I saw two posts: one of yours claiming you were blocked without any warning at all, and another by an administrator who was considering unblocking. Actually you had been warned and were misrepresenting that history to a sysop. That created a reason to follow up. If you are willing to be reasonable, shake cyberhands, and seek normal dispute resolution I could ask the administrators to shorten your block to 48 hours. <font face="Verdana">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 04:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :: I have read (again) ]. and will look to apply it in all my actions here on ] and I hope and expect to see it applied towards me. When my ban expires in a few hours I would like te opportunity to comment on the Af..deletion regarding ] and then to move on . I am not the type of person to bear a grudge or to seek retribution. regards and a handshake to all . (] (]) 19:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC)) | |||
Revision as of 19:10, 16 April 2009
 Archives |
| No archives yet. |
Feel free
If you post here, I will reply on my talk page or on your talk page, I don't really mind. Messages containing personal attacks or severe incivility will not be responded to, and may be removed.
(Quickest/best) talk to us live.
(note to self.Synthesis of published material that advances a position WP:SYN)
I would prefer it if you left any warnings on your talk page and I'll come look for them there.
- Before you bother posting anything here be aware (Self-awareness)that according to User:Ironholds I appear to be a
- WP:POVPUSH pov-pusher with edit warring tendancies WP:EW and you would be wise to treat anything I say with a Pinch of salt.
- "Browsing through Off2riorob's contributions, talkpage and block log he appears to be a pov-pusher with edit warring tendencies; I'd treat anything he says with a pinch of salt".
- I realise there is a shred of hypocrisy in this Ironholds (talk) 08:42, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
- "Browsing through Off2riorob's contributions, talkpage and block log he appears to be a pov-pusher with edit warring tendencies; I'd treat anything he says with a pinch of salt".
AfD nomination of Osho Follower
I have nominated Osho Follower, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Osho Follower. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cirt (talk) 21:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
I have been blocked for 72 hours without warning.
I have been blocked without any warning at all , while an article I have been writing today has been nominated for deletion and I have been left with out the ability to defend myself or my article . Have a look and pass a comment.The article is here Osho Follower and the deletion page is here Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Osho Follower (Off2riorob (talk) 23:57, 15 April 2009 (UTC))
- Let me ping the blocker. Blocking without warning, or edit warring, doesn't seem square here. rootology (C)(T) 01:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Actually he's received at least two warnings, Root. Here's one diff from April 12. I'll get more in a moment. Durova 01:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- April 10. Which he acknowledged explicitly. April 9. March 30. March 26. On April 12 he posted I would prefer it if you left any warnings on your talk page and I'll come look for them there, which makes it a bit difficult to track what other warnings he's gotten since then. A convenient arrangement, if four days later one claims one was never warned. Durova 01:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- @Rootology - This user has been warned by different admins multiple times, for disruption on the same topic: Osho, and specifically on the WP:GA rated article 1985 Rajneeshee assassination plot. See ANI thread , and the user's prior block log . The prior warnings to this user by other admins do not appear currently at this user talk page as he has a habit of blanking them. Cirt (talk) 01:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- April 10. Which he acknowledged explicitly. April 9. March 30. March 26. On April 12 he posted I would prefer it if you left any warnings on your talk page and I'll come look for them there, which makes it a bit difficult to track what other warnings he's gotten since then. A convenient arrangement, if four days later one claims one was never warned. Durova 01:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- Actually he's received at least two warnings, Root. Here's one diff from April 12. I'll get more in a moment. Durova 01:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
ah. here is durova seeking revenge (which is not a good trait for an admin )for my comment posted on the page seeking to test support for her return to adminship as recently as april 8., durova quotes a comment from iridesant that she left on my talk page regarding my editing jimbo wales talk page which as I replied to her is a common occurance and not something j wales complains about. here is that reply to iridesant . and we have curt here demanding the harshest punishment . Here cirt tonight posted a comment requesting support from people from the orogon project to support his position. theonly unbiased person I see here is Rootology , and I want to thank him for that. and my first block by peter symonds was imo a bit keen and in support of cirt and when he also noted to be his thoughts on my editing ... here it is.. I'm surprised to see you engaged in the same activity (revert warring over sources, editing the same articles) that got you blocked in the first place. Your disregarding the warnings of myself and others is not appreciated. Please stop, or you will be blocked for a longer period. Thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
{{help}}(Off2riorob (talk) 19:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)) I am sourceing books and inserting cites in good faith. please could I have a comment from an independant admin(Off2riorob (talk) 19:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)).
In reply I got some good advice from chez.
Rather than just filling the page up with red why not try and help the situation . I would like to know exactly why yellowman jumped out from nowhere and banned me for 72 hours . I was working away on my article in good faith , cirt had nominated it for deletion , Iwas cool , Iwas editing and commenting in an attempt to save the work I had done .. I was cool , I wasnt rude to anyone , I had asked and got a third party opinion on points in cirts article and accepted the 3rd opinion.. and gone of on a tangent with the Osho followers page .. which even though you are debating its deletion which is ok ,perhaps some of the cites are not encyclopedic and some of the people mentioned arent worthy but I was open to working on that to improve it.. when I look at it now I am so proud of it ,, 4 months ago I had no idea about cites and links and it was terrifying ..how to add an internal and an external and how to rename a link and how to insert pictures and I didnt have a clue and it took a lot of learning to get to this point ..
so I know my intention and what I have done and I would just ask that I would be treated in an unbiased way. and get a punishment that I actually diserve ,, which is not a three day ban without an official warning .. you know .. one of those red hands .. actually someone asked what else was yellowman supposed to do .. well he could of issued me a final warning ..which probably would have sufficed . (Off2riorob (talk) 03:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC))
- Rob, please review Misplaced Pages:Assume good faith. I had no intention to seek 'revenge'. You happen to have sought me out recently, in a rather memorable way, and it is not unusual to watchlist a user talk after that type of exchange. Today it came up on the watchlist and I saw two posts: one of yours claiming you were blocked without any warning at all, and another by an administrator who was considering unblocking. Actually you had been warned and were misrepresenting that history to a sysop. That created a reason to follow up. If you are willing to be reasonable, shake cyberhands, and seek normal dispute resolution I could ask the administrators to shorten your block to 48 hours. Durova 04:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
- I have read (again) WP:AGF. and will look to apply it in all my actions here on Misplaced Pages and I hope and expect to see it applied towards me. When my ban expires in a few hours I would like te opportunity to comment on the Af..deletion regarding Osho Follower and then to move on . I am not the type of person to bear a grudge or to seek retribution. regards and a handshake to all . (Off2riorob (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2009 (UTC))