| Revision as of 07:27, 1 October 2005 editIcarus3 (talk | contribs)8,672 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:19, 15 November 2005 edit undoStbalbach (talk | contribs)24,748 edits On SourcesNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :Obviously we need a source. This is not the first time Ive heard this, so there may be somthing to it more than POV by the anon user, but without a source, it needs a source. ] 04:59, 1 October 2005 (UTC) | :Obviously we need a source. This is not the first time Ive heard this, so there may be somthing to it more than POV by the anon user, but without a source, it needs a source. ] 04:59, 1 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| ::I say we leave it for a week or so to allow someone to add a source, and then remove it if it does not have a source at that point. If it's true, it can always be added back whenever someone does present a source. --] 07:27, 1 October 2005 (UTC) | ::I say we leave it for a week or so to allow someone to add a source, and then remove it if it does not have a source at that point. If it's true, it can always be added back whenever someone does present a source. --] 07:27, 1 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == On Sources == | |||
| There is no factual reson to doubt the documents authenticity. Court records are not always made available online by the court, and any transcript made available from a third party could just as easily be discounted for the same reasons, its a burdon of proof that is extreme, Misplaced Pages is not original research, it reports on what others are saying and lets the reader decide. ] 20:19, 15 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:19, 15 November 2005
Is there a source for the claim that Barrett isn't currently licensed to practice medicine? --Icarus 03:19, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Obviously we need a source. This is not the first time Ive heard this, so there may be somthing to it more than POV by the anon user, but without a source, it needs a source. Stbalbach 04:59, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- I say we leave it for a week or so to allow someone to add a source, and then remove it if it does not have a source at that point. If it's true, it can always be added back whenever someone does present a source. --Icarus 07:27, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
On Sources
There is no factual reson to doubt the documents authenticity. Court records are not always made available online by the court, and any transcript made available from a third party could just as easily be discounted for the same reasons, its a burdon of proof that is extreme, Misplaced Pages is not original research, it reports on what others are saying and lets the reader decide. Stbalbach 20:19, 15 November 2005 (UTC)