Revision as of 04:18, 25 April 2009 edit74.162.148.208 (talk) →Freebie← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:39, 25 April 2009 edit undoIkip (talk | contribs)59,234 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
I'm personally fine adding these to my section, but yours is very well structured and helpful so I'll follow your recommendation. Also this cite (already in the list above) shows Collect reintroducing OR, where he brings in legal research and applies to Joe.] (]) 14:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC) | I'm personally fine adding these to my section, but yours is very well structured and helpful so I'll follow your recommendation. Also this cite (already in the list above) shows Collect reintroducing OR, where he brings in legal research and applies to Joe.] (]) 14:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I give both you and Brendan19 permission to edit my section. Ikip. 14:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC) | :I give both you and Brendan19 permission to edit my section. Ikip. 14:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
==No flagged revisions category up for deletion== | |||
The category associated with the no flagged revisions userbox you have placed on your user page is up for deletion at ] and you are invited to share your opinions on the issue. ] (]) 04:56, 23 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Need help decifering policy == | |||
Hey Ikip long time no see, okay its been a week and many rescues later I have ran into another issue. Apparently my sources on ] have been hailed as me adding Original research into this article into an attempt to save it. Apparently my sources violate ], and ] (a policy I have had trouble with in the past) so I wonder if you could take a look over at the sources for me. Thanks yet again, -<strong><font style="color:#228B22">]</font>(<small>]</small>) </strong> 22:22, 24 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:39, 25 April 2009
Click here to leave me a messageAwards and articles I created. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats'_noticeboard/RfA_Report
Best welcome template: User:AxG/WikiWelcome1 wikipediareview: History of wikipedia |
more for the list
RE: Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Collect
. you could use this as an example of not getting along well w/ others, strawman arguments, general rudeness ("I have now editted well over 250 pages -- and I think you have not. Thabnks! And please feel free not to reply. Collect (talk) 11:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)") or a new section composed of his false accusations w/out apology or acknowledgment. or you dont have to use this at all. i just thought it was a good example of poor behavior on his part. Brendan19 (talk) 07:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- It would be much more convincing if you created your own section, or added this to your section. I am going over 5,000 edits, so it is hard to add everything, even with the magic of collapsible sections. Ikip (talk) 13:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi Ikip. Here are a series of deletions on Joe the Plumber that you were also involved with. This would fall under the section of deleting well sourced content:
I'm personally fine adding these to my section, but yours is very well structured and helpful so I'll follow your recommendation. Also this cite (already in the list above) shows Collect reintroducing OR, where he brings in legal research and applies to Joe.Mattnad (talk) 14:17, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
- I give both you and Brendan19 permission to edit my section. Ikip. 14:18, 20 April 2009 (UTC)